Allodial Earth.
Written by Abdun Nur J.   

   Active Image

Version 9 – 31th October 2015

Allodial Earth

All the Earth is allodial, it is innately substantive (free of fictions) and utilitarian (its importance is a measure of its usefulness) by its very nature, as are the fruits of the Earth, as is all life upon the Earth, as we did not create the abundance upon the Earth, only enjoy its rewards, its bounty and its abundance; if free to do so.

The understanding of the innate allodial system is simple, you can only own externally that which you yourself create, otherwise you are simply utilising what already exists. So the land is always free, only the physical labours invested in the land have a value that you may exchange in trade. To apply the term ownership to the term allodial is an oxymoron, self-contradictory; as the land is “utilized” in allodium, as are all the natural resources, so to own them is impossible substantively.

Allodial comes from allōd which means free of any grant, claim, registration; so “unattested”, utilised undivided, completely, unimpaired, free from all shared gains; so utilised in its “entirety”; having a nature that bears on its ability to satisfy stated and implied needs. This innate concept of allodium applies not just to utilising the land and resources but also to interactions with life itself. An example:

If I plant a field of watermelons, the watermelons are the bounty of the Creator, grown from the earth and out of the seed, and from the design of the Creator, but the physical labour you invested in the planting of the seed, the preparing of the land, the harvesting and marketing of the watermelons, is what you have honestly earned and deserve in reward of your labour, so when you sell the watermelon, the watermelon itself is free, as it is the bounty of the Creator, but the labour it took to reach its end user and consumer must be paid by the end user and consumer.

The Creator (Mother Nature itself can be viewed as the Creator) has provided you the materials, while you provide the labour, investing the time and energy, a living souls creativity is the true medium of exchange of equitable community. (See ‘Bonded Cooperative Occupational System’)

In the modern age individuals sell the bounty of the Creator (naturally occurring resources), they profit from the abundance, they monopolise it and enslave all around them through the concept of ownership, but who gave them the right to sell something that they do not and could not equitably own, where did they establish that ownership?

Who established they had a right to buy and sell the property of the Creator, the Earth and its abundance?

Whoever did, was a thief, a fraudster and an extorter!

To buy and sell stolen goods created by the hands of man is bad enough, but to buy and sell the stolen goods of the Earth, her natural resources, takes a stupid soul indeed, and for the majority to accept that theft without comment or protest demonstrates how far from truth the collective consciousness has been blinded to the true understanding of reality, and how deeply indoctrinated into accepting constructed legal fictions as truth the common souls are.

Allodial Utilisation

Allodial utilisation is a situation where real resources (land, buildings and fixtures) are utilised free and clear of any encumbrances, including liens, mortgages and tax obligations. Allodial utilisation is unalienable, in that it cannot be taken by any operation of any court, moot or Witena-gemot, etc. for any reason whatsoever, (beyond the breach of a binding of behaviour attached to the utilisation, committed as an intentional action of manifesting long term damage to surrounding land.)

Allodial lands are the absolute exclusively utilised resource of their custodian and not subject to any service or acknowledgement to any imposed or imagined superior, this concept denies the fictional legal power of municipal and state governments to tax property, (if they're in existence) on the basis that allodial utilisation cannot be alienated by failure to pay those taxes, and further that no legal fiction can be applied to a substantive system.

Allodial utilisation cannot be alienated through seizure by a creditor, as the claim of the foreclosure by the mortgagee is both dishonest in relation to the axioms of the land and inequitable. However, by its nature, allodial utilisation cannot be mortgaged in the first place, and an attempt to create any invented concept of allodial title, claim, grant or registration on land in order to make it a fiction in commerce, that could then be subject to encumbrance by debt, is impossible substantively. (To create or attach a title, grant or register means the land is not allodial but held in the colour of law ownership system.)

Within The Concepts Of Islam And Innately In Axiom Of Inherent Power, The Entire Earth Is Allodial By Its Very Nature

Although allodial utilisation cannot be lost, that also means that it cannot be transferred or encumbered without losing its allodial merit as utilised, as no soul is in physical occupation, all innate resources return back to nature. As such, when an allodial custodian dies and leaves the resources that had been in their custody to more than one heir, the conceptual custodial allodial utilisation of the resources are lost, if the creator of added value to the natural resources has bequeathed those labours to heirs, this situation must be resolved as quickly as possible, so re-establishing the correct Allodial utilisation, the labours upon the land must be, reassigned, divided, sold or agreement of the parties to settle and establish a single custodian. This process failing to be accomplished the utilisation and resources quickly revert back to nature.

Consent is the basis of land utilisation, and when a utiliser transfers that utilisation, the new allodarii must seek the consent of those utilising the land around that declared utilisation. This is done through the creation of a unilateral Bona Gestura’ Bindan of Allodarii (Bindan of Good Behaviour). Each neighbour must witness the agreement that is self imposed and self binding, to behaviour in utilisation within the bounds of the agreement, the neighbours may ask for greater constraints than stated and the agreement would then reflect those request. 

Allodial utilisation cannot be mortgaged (as is common in a usury system). Moreover, as liens cannot attach to allodial utilisation, it is difficult to finance improvements (if considered from the perspective of a usury system). The single custodian investing their energies in the improvement and development of their resources does so in allodium, those improvements becoming part of the allodial utilisation and so become exempt from lien or seizure of their resources to pay a worker's bill. The burden of responsibility to honour these debts, if established equitably, is solely upon the custodian, only the excess fruits generated from the resources of the custodian could be seized, that clearly stands beyond the needs of the custodian and their dependents, as only the fruits generated represent the wealth, meaning the labour invested within the produced goods from the resources, but not the fixed resources themselves, of land, nor all the essential created resources, tools, or personal possessions. (See ‘Repository Finance’)

Allodial utilisation cannot, in theory, be taken away by any court, Witena-gemot, or moot, etc. against the will of the custodian (known as the allodarii). However, an allodial custodian can through witnessed written agreement give up allodial custodial resources to another, even an agreement whereby those allodial resources can be restored at a later date as long as that agreement is free of usurious advantage or gains, and as long as the new utiliser established the consent of the neighbours to bind his behaviour to relief; also resources can be sold as a free attachment to the added value of the labours invested within them, so for example I could build a house, sell the house and the land it sits upon is free, however the new utiliser must first established the consent of the neighbours to bind his behaviour to relief; alternatively resources can be passed on to an heir, or given as a gift, after assent of those neighbouring the land in the ratification of the existing binding of behaviour. Consent is the basis of the allodial model, you cannot take resources without the consent of those physically around them, even a soul inheriting resources must seek the consent of their neighbours and establish the binding of a bond of behaviour unilaterally, being obligatory upon them to safeguard their neighbours from actions otherwise tortious. Allodial utilisation cannot be exchanged by fraud, only by witnessed written agreement. (For example you could not use your allodial resources as a stake for a wager, just as much as the collateral for a loan.)

Allodial resources cannot be owned by a corporation, being a group recognised as a ‘person’ through the fictions of legislation, being a group colony of individuals, working in unity against the community for their own benefit. Only living souls can utilise allodial resources substantively, so always free of all fictions, and act physically as custodian under the axiom of the land.

All resources are Allodial universally, resources without a custodian are held by nature, and custodially utilised by individuals when there is a need. Otherwise it remains open to all to enjoy, and for local community projects, within the concept of each living soul being a protective custodian.

Land alone can have no saleable value, it can be given or exchanged for equal land in another location if those around the land accept the new binding of behaviour, but not sold, as it is in custody only, however the fixed labour invested in the land, labour integral that forms added worth, such as making the land arable, buildings, crops; seasonal or annual, like planted trees; all have value and can be sold with the transferred obligations (binding of behaviour) of the custodial utilisation of the land, which attaches no cost.

If you irreparably damage the land, as its custodian, through contaminating it with poisons, damage its nature with cross species genetically modified crops, making it radioactive, any long term effects that detrimentally effect not just your allodial land, but the surrounding lands through intentional assault, breaks the covenant with nature, and therefore even without a unilateral binding of behaviour the axioms of the land holds those responsible accountable for the cost and effort of rectifying the surrounding contamination, as it is a tortious action against your neighbour. If the custodian damages their Allodial land without affecting any surrounding land it is a tortious act and stands between the custodian and the Creator. But these abuses would have a bearing on the local community accepting the binding agreement for new allodial custodial utilisation in any future declaration.

As the entire Earth, categorically, is allodial, the substance of the Earth itself would also be allodial, for example the minerals of the earth are free in and of themselves, it is only the labour and small equipment charge, and the cost of any consumables used, in the extraction and purification and delivery of the minerals, that could be charged for something which no soul could own, (you would own your labours, as your labours are your own, this is the added value invested in the minerals after extraction and processing, so in effect the minerals are owned by the attachment to the labours invested through that action, much like land use and the fruits it bears), only your labour within an allodial system would be chargeable above the overheads (what you charge for your labours is up to you, but in a free market without monopoly, competition balances and dictates that value), the same concept would apply to crops and fruits, the labour value would be charged and overheads, the bounty of the Creator would always be freely given, the concept of profit is usurious, as it is a charge added (interest) for the use of capital, but that is not required in a system free of usury.

When true equitable intent becomes prevalent, the system would invigorate commodities, no market of exploitation to hype the price beyond reason, no futures market to speculate on production, no investment market to gamble on price fluctuations, no monopolies to extort undeserved rewards from the weak and powerless.

Or for an imposed sovereign to claim ownership and sell rights to mine any of these fruits of the Earth, which is an iniquitous act, all innate things of the Earth are the bounty of nature, they cannot be sold, owned, or monopolised.

The wealth hoarding elite have vilified the Qur’an, and worked to bewilder the religious minded about what its purpose was, with good reason from their point of view, however to reference that book, when the Qur'an is talking of hoarding the Creator's bounty, it is not in reference to saving of coins, or individual possessions, but the hoarding of the resources of the Creator, the natural resources of the Earth. (Qur'an, Al-Imran 3:180)

Modern land law

Ownership of property

(See – Possession versus Utilisation of the Land)

The opposing concept to allodium is to establish Vadium, which means gage, a pledge; a pledge is a deposit of personal property by way of security for the performance of another act. There is a difference between a gage (pledge) and a mortgage (death pledge), in a gage the legal title grant of the pledged property remains with the pledger while the property is possessed within the ‘engagement’ meaning the obligation of the pledge. With a mortgage title passes to the mortgagee; a mortgage is a contract by which specific property is hypothecated for the performance of an act without the necessity of a change of possession. So in a gage it remains your property possessed by another until the gage is disengaged, with a death gage title is lost but possession is not until the death of the gage and its disengagement.

The first thing to note about the legal profession is they function exclusively within positive law, this invented fictional structure of violently imposed constructed law is divided in to many subdivisions, but the main source of positive law is legislation.

So you may ask, what is the termed legal, and legislation?

Legislation is the policy of a corporation, and only applies to agents working, being authored, for that fictional construct, this is why the legal policy and corporate State bureaucracy make ‘a living soul’ into a citizen, which is authored by the corporation as a straw man, allowing it to act against you and positively impose the constructed fictional law upon you, as it has authority over all it authors. (See: ‘Tortious Arbitration’)

The term law is in truth not valid, the true term is axioms of the land. In reality the legal profession knows very little about the innate axioms of the land, but are experts on narrow areas of legislation; meaning corporate State policy.

Ownership is derived from feudalism. (See: The Nature of Ownership)

The extent of land ownership, and the denial of the natural allodial utilisation within Britain is founded upon the simple trust created and imposed in 1086 through the first census of the Crowns property, which they viewed as owned until doomsday, the Doomsday Book. This imposed theft and hoarding was achieved through genocide, and the subjugation by force of arms of the surviving indigenous souls, successfully initiated from 1066, renamed England, Angle land, by those conquerors, formally Albien, meaning ‘the surface of the earth’.

History is mainly a fabrication; the history of Britain was fabricated mainly from the 12th century by agents of the Vatican; if you consider the evidence that history is unsupportable. For example the feudal system did not exist in Britain until introduced by William the bastard, now we can accept that this imposed feudal model was imposed, as it is now in operation and has been since the point of the claimed conquering of Britain. Now if you study the events they do not add up of that mainstream history of that conquering.

Firstly William brought wooden fortresses over with a large force, documents do exist from several sources to support this, although the Vatican agents have historically both destroy documents that refute their lies, and also fabricate documents that support their lies. They landed on the British coast, the first lie they fought a feudal King at Hastings, although widespread archeology has been done at the locations of the battle, in all those many excavations the only thing that has ever been found is one axe head dating to that period, there was “never” a huge battle at Hastings, it was a fabrication.

Second point William moved to London with his huge force, and laid siege to the city, and attacked cities on the journey, burning them to the ground even if they surrendered, as to impose feudalism you must exterminate the existing allodial population, surrender has no meaning when genocide is the objective. But if he had just had a battle with a force of equal size, his forces would have been greatly diminished, however they were not. Additionally in all descriptions of the fabricated battle at Hastings no mention of the use of the wooden forts was made.

The reason William conquered Britain was not through skill or fighting ability, it was through a new technology of war, firstly moveable wooden fortresses that were used to force the local population to build stone castles, and if any trouble came the mercenaries bolted back to their fortress and hid, or used it as a defensible position. It was castles that conquered the population, the cowardly mercenaries murdered, raped and pillaged, then when people came after them, they ran away as quickly as possible to the castles to hide, and repel attacks.

There was no King feudal system in Britain except for the small kingdoms created periodically by the Germans, who kept episodically coming to southern Britain to rape, murder and pillage then set up extortion rackets upon the local populations, these military adventures the Vatican agents named kingdoms, which William adapted as counties, however they were driven off again and again over the centuries. The Danes were settling as brothers with the indigenous British population, and the German kingdoms in Southern Britain had all but been exterminated of the Angles and the Saxons, leaving only a few hiding out as felonious murderers and thieves, driven to the coasts at the bottom of Britain.

All the fabricated hierarchies claimed to have existed in Britain of the Vatican history are simply created to give support to the feudal king model, as if that nonsense had always existed, and no other model could.

The Roman cult responsible for the imposition of the feudal system globally, recognises aspects of the allodial concept of exclusive utilisation, even though it works to prevent it: 'Cuius est solum eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos'

Which means: “In granted right to own the land, it’s owned to the sky and even down to hell” commonly translated as: 'He who owns the land owns everything 'up to the sky and down to the centre of the earth'.

This is the innate nature of allodium, you utilise the land in its entirety, undivided; so within this Vatican amalgamated Latin maxim the legislated fiction of ownership is entangled. The hierarchical elite constructs further positive legislation to obviate the innate reality for the contrived, with the following legislative acts:

“In terms of downward ownership: so that coal and gas found under land are now subject to public (meaning Crown) ownership.” (Petroleum Act 1934- Coal Industry Act 1994) Other than that, items found buried in the soil are yours, unless constituting treasure trove,(Treasure Act 1996) in which case the treasure belongs to the crown...”(Oxford Modern land law 4th edt)

 

In the case of civil aircraft, the matter is regulated by statute, Section 76 of the Civil Aircraft Act 1982.

An ‘authored’ statute is a formal written enactment of legislative ‘authority’ that governs the constructed legal fictions of a city, state or country themselves founded on the construct of ownership which supports the construct of sovereignty. All statute is simply imposed positive law; meaning a corporations legislated rules; so only binding upon registration to the corporate legislating body, of either the resource utilised, or the one utilising it, registration gifts control of a resource or soul to the corporation taking the register; the Crown Corporation in Britain of the City of London.

“One speaks of ownership of a car yet, in the context of land, one does not, technically, refer to ownership of the land; instead, an abstract entity, known as an 'Estate' was created and one's ownership rights are defined by this abstract entity.”(Introduction to the Law of Property. 1958)

 

Modern legislative law is a circular fiction, the fiction creates the fiction; as corporate policy creating the concept of the corporation, to perform this trick, they must create the fiction of the corporation to apply upon the living soul, and the resources of the living soul, without this fiction they would have no basis to act, they must author to have authority.

This is the reason they establish status, and must apply a title indicating status before your name in court, Mister, Mrs, Master, Miss, man, human, person, etc. or use a title in place of resources as in estate, property, possession, etc. The entire land ownership fraud is based on fictions of law, no one has ever had a ‘right’ of ownership, ever, they only have the inherent power to utilise the resources of the Earth, and communally to utilise resources within a community, and to exclusively utilise their own labours. For example under the feudal structure it is claimed the Queen of England owns a 6th of the surface of the Earth, as the figure head of the Crown Corporation (The City).

 

Within a substantive moot model it is impossible for a State, corporation or sovereign to exist, it is against equity, and an affront to the inherent power of the individual. And the sovereigns know this, but do not want you to, once the status of the land is changed from owned to allodial, sovereignty is stripped away.

Corporation

A corporation is an artificial person, invisible, intangible, and existing only in contemplation of legislation. Being the mere creature of legislation, it possesses only those properties which the charter of its creation confers upon it, either expressly or as incidental to its very existence. The attributes of the corporate structure are:

 

·        Immortality - allowed through a perpetual succession of many persons considered as the same so acting as a single entity.

 

·        Individuality – enables a corporation to manage its own affairs, hold property without perplexing intricacies, of the hazardous and endless necessity of perpetual conveyances needed to transmit ownership from hand to hand.

 

·        A franchise - clothing bodies of men in free succession, with qualities and capacities capable of acting for the promotion of a particular object, like one immortal being.

 

·        A body politic – vested under a special denomination of legislation, to act as a united will of unified power, undisturbed by the change of members, enjoying legislated rights and privileges.

 

·        Limited liability – this possesses many advantages to the corporation, it supports the suppression of financial liabilities, in compensation, reparations, remunerations; and in personal accountability, cloaking the guilty in the blanket of the corporate fiction, so limiting personal accountability of environmental destruction and pollution, social exploitation and enslavement; take the food chain, corporate employees defiling plants, animals and living souls with poisons, genetically modified perversions of nature, chemical infusion etc. acting with impunity; also stealing with deceptions, creating wars, hardship, terrorism, taking away inherent power and the liberties that affords and natural equity from communities, families and individuals. Additionally leaving creditors empty handed if the fiction of the indebted corporation is dissolved. This allows the corporation to externalise the greater portion of the risks of financial and moral liabilities, imposing them upon communities at large.

 

·        Monopoly – corporations of themselves are giant monopoly privileges, using the construct of copy right, economy of scale, dictating price and terms of supply and legislation of privileges; such as the printing of money for the cost of printing in the case of the Central Corporate Banks for example, being a coercive monopoly. Even in the small scale corporation is structured on monopoly, taking the fruits of the labour of the employees and monopolising this to the advantage of the financiers. Another simple example of coercive monopoly would be Microsoft, were they dominate through enforced copyright, resulting in a poor quality product almost free of competition. The state itself is the most extreme coercive monopoly as they use violence and intimidation to enforce a perceived compulsory monopoly.

 

The roots of the corporation go back deep into history, the word "corporation" derives from corpus, the Latin word for body, or a "body of people". The structure of corporations existed in ancient Roman and the ancient Indian Empire of Maurya, and continued into the modern biosphere from its ancient existence, from the evolution of the failed brutal Roman Empire, as it collapsed under the exploitations of usury, transforming into the blind faith and mental enslavement of the Roman Catholic Church, the largest corporation on the Earth, as it incorporates many subordinate corporations within it.

Inherent power

Unalienable and immutable is the innate inherent power each living soul is endowed with upon their creation, this stands in direct opposition to the imposed positive law model, which is based upon a superior granting rights and privileges upon inferiors, a master, slave structure.

Only through trickery and confusion can we be robbed of our inherent power, this being the job of the legal profession, this means they work to prevent you having allodial resources, as this would prevent fictions of law being applied to them, so they create a fiction which is the abstract entity of estate as described above. (See ‘The Onion of Ownership’)

“English law has never embraced the concept of absolute ownership of land. The closest it has come to doing so is when a person is registered as the proprietor of land with an absolute title. Even then, however, as will be seen, that person's title is not indefeasible. Where title to the land is unregistered, this is even more the case. All that a person can do is to demonstrate that he has the better right to possess the land than anyone else.”(Modern Land Law 4th edn.)

English land law only existed upon the creating of the constructs established from 1066, in subduing the original Albic nation, which was an allodial land system, and additionally not a Roman Catholic enclave. (See 'Rex Offa of Mercia (Northern Britain))

 

How do they justify their right to buy and sell the earth?

Religion.

“To make better rights impossible the proof would have to start with the granting to Adam and Eve, but even then this was save and except the Garden of Eden, and one is not even sure if they took as joint tenants or tenants in common....”(Ferrand, Contract and Conveyance 4th edn.)

However the Bible first written at the council of Nicea and rewritten at other points in history states: "to work it and watch over it,"(Bible, Old Testament, Genesis)

Leviticus 25:23, "The land shall not be sold for ever: for the land is mine; for ye are strangers and sojourners with me."

For those who hold a degree of belief in the Qur’an, it gives the same concept as the Bible and full support to the innate concepts expressed within this essay of the allodium of the Earth.

[4:132]   To Allah belongs everything in the heavens and the earth, and Allah is the only Protector.

2: 255 - 2:284 - 3:109 - 3:129 - 3:189 - 4:126 - 4:131 - 4:170 - 4:172 - 5:17 - 5:18 - 5:120 - 6:12 - 7:128 Etc.

The very foundation of the legal right establishing the Sovereigns ownership, to buy and sell, is a lie, never were Adam and Eve given the Earth as owners, only as custodians with obligations and restrictions, so simply to utilise the resources they needed.

“After the Norman invasion in 1066, a rigorous feudal structure was imposed upon the country. Central to it was the notion, still true to this day, that all the land belonged to the Crown.- This process led to the formation of a feudal pyramid.”(An Introduction to the History of Land Law 1961 Ch. 1)

William the Bastard (Conqueror) never purchased the land of Albien (Albien meaning - the surface world or earth), nor took any legal ownership that would be supported; he murdered the allodarii, allodial custodians, and held it by force, changing the name from Albien to England (Angle land), which explains this:

“The fact of possession of a chattel of itself gives to the possessor a possessory title and the possessor is entitled to rely on such title without reference to the circumstances in which such possession was obtained; his entitlement to do so is not prejudiced by the fact that he obtained such possession unlawfully or by an illegal transaction.”(Ibid. At 157. Contrast Hibbert v. McKiernan 1948)

William the Bastard was in subjugation to the Pope, and established the Crown as owner of the land and all upon it, later King John of England (king 6th April 1199 - 19th Oct 1216) was excommunicated from the Church, to meet demands to be re-embraced and to avert the army massed against him on the coast of France by the Vatican, he surrendered the legal construct of the crown monarch rights of ownership to the Roman Catholic Church Corporation, making them the Crown Corporation, so transferring the “legal fiction” of owner of England, given as a Papal Legate to Bishop Pandulph in May 1213.

Two years later, at the point of a sword King John signed the Magna Carta Libertatum (the Great Charter of Freedoms – 1215). This charter was written by the Arch Bishop of Canterbury Stephen Langton, the papal legate (personal representative of the Pope to a foreign land) ex officio (from the office – or – by right of office), for the protection of the contract establishing the Church as the corporate owner of England, through the manipulation of the Barons and lords. However Pope Innocent III publicly declared outrage at the "shameful and demeaning agreement, forced upon the King by violence and fear." He rejected any call for restraints on the King, saying it impaired John's dignity. He pretended it was an affront to the Church's authority over the King and the 'papal territories' of England and Ireland, and he released John from his oath to obey it, of course the Barons and Lords made certain it was obeyed, as without a method of holding a monarch to submission the agreement between the monarch and the Vatican could easily be dissolved. The Crown Corporation is the legal owner of England, as maintained through legal fictions, standing in direct conflict with the unalienable and immutable axioms of the land. (See ‘Inherent Power’)

The crown seated its authority within a square mile of London, known as the City, they issued a new Charter for the 'City' of London, within the twelfth century, granted by Henry I, among other thing this charter grants:

“A justice, whomsoever they please from among themselves, to keep the pleas of my (the Popes) crown and try them, and no other man is to be justice over the said men of London. And the citizens (of the City) shall not be impleaded (sued in a court of law) in any plea outside the walls of the city......And with regard to lands......I will on their behalf maintain justice according to the law of the city.” (Borough Customs, Selden Society, Vols. 18 and 21(1904-6) Mary Bateson, And British Borough Charters, 1216-1307 (1923) A. Ballard and J. Tait)

“It remains theoretically true to say that all land is held from the Crown. The idea that one does not actually own the thing itself but rather has an interest in it, is also what underlies the theoretical basis of landholding in this country:”(Modern Land Law 4thedn)

 

“..it is now assumed that an owner of land holds directly from the Crown as tenant in Chief but without the provision of any service in respect of that holding. The effect of the statute 'Quia Emptores' is that, when a house is sold, the purchaser replaces the vendor as the tenant in chief, holding the land directly from the Crown.”(Modern Land Law 4th edn)

 

“The plaintiff cannot recover but upon the strength of his own title. He cannot found a claim upon the weakness of the defendant's title. For possession gives the defendant a right against every man who cannot show a good title.” (Roe d. Haldane v. Harvey 1769)

 

“Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public (Crown) interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law (meaning legislation) and by the general principles of international law.” (meaning international legislation)”(Human Rights Act 1998 Article 1)

 

“Section 15 of the Limitation Act 1980 provides that no action shall be brought by any person to recover any land after the expiration of twelve years from the date on which the right of action accrued to him, or if first accrued to some person through whom he claims, that person.” (Modern Land Law 4th edn)

Conclusion

The real hurdle most people have to overcome consciously is to stop conferring authority to the state, sovereigns or corporations; blind and unquestioning obedience to authority is ingrained through the media whore of the establishment, and the corporate education system.

State Corporations enslaves minds to be subjugated by the system into taking authority submissively, and actively supporting the constructs of authored fictions designed to subjugate the thoughtless, who take as truth authored lies without investigation, instead of establishing the reasoned truth; all souls should independently establish through reason and physical evidence, truth, this is true power.

For most to take what is theirs is a difficult thing, as they believe someone else has ownership of their labours, and of the natural resources of the Creator, this is the result of a lifetime of propaganda, social conditioning and never being exposed to any alternative community model, of a truly equitable community order.
 
So if the idea of just taking the land, through the allodial process, utilised from their own innate inherent power, free of any fiction or superior, is suggested, without registering it to the corporate state; as when you register it, you create a fictional ownership held by the corporation you are registering it to, and so make yourself the tenant. Yet for most people the subjugation is so deeply ingrained they cannot even consider not paying for the land, and would never refuse to register it and so grant a share of their labours as a gift to their self-imposed landlord.

Solution

The answer to this is simple, if you wish to buy a home, farm, business premises from an individual, who themselves have paid and worked to create the added value upon the land, then pay for the resources, take the documentation they provide, however, do not register anything with the state, or any other corporate fiction.

When transferring custodial utilisation, establish a new document of allodial declaration based upon your innate inherent power, witnessed, and free of all and any positive law fictions. This new document can be copied and stored, in case of loss or accidental destruction, with a community based administrator, or other secure location. Seek the consent of your neighbours to witness you unilateral oath of behaviour and terms of relief if broken.

This concept would only be applicable to a living soul, (under inherent power expressed through tortious relief and the innate axioms of the land only living souls and substantive creation exist, no fictions of states, corporations or monarchies are recognised), you could not buy the land or a property from a corporation as they are a fiction, so corporation cannot be validated through buying the property of the Creator from them.

This action requires the refusal to pay any tribute to the corporation of State that has iniquitously placed its homage of taxation and regulation through the dishonest fiction of estate; the unity of community standing together united in truth, to hold what is yours free of taxation of any kind, to strip away the constructed legal fictions floated upon the sea of commerce must be established. See ‘Method of Allodial Declaration’

Active Image