Home arrow Law of Men. (The First Crusade)
Law of Men. (The First Crusade) PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 22
Written by Abdun Nur J   
Version 2 – 22nd December 2012

Law of Men. (The First Crusade)

 Active Image

The modern national legal structure.

“Written laws are like spiders’ webs; they will catch, it is true, the weak and poor, but would be torn in pieces by the rich and powerful.” Anacharsis (Scythian Prince) 6th century BC

The law of most of the modern world is based on ancient Roman law (the State is God), the Jesuits have made enormous efforts, to both establish, and justify this prejudiced corporation (State), designed to subjugate the poor, and protect the rich and powerful from prosecution or conviction.

The Roman Catholic knights Templar (Knights of the Military Order of the Temple of Solomon) established the Temple bar; initially constructing a building on what is now Chancery Lane, a round church patterned on the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. An inscription on the Round recorded that it was consecrated by the Patriarch Heraclius on 10 February 1185, in honour of the Blessed Virgin Mary. It is thought that King Henry II was also present on that day, one of a line of monarchs installed and instructed by the Roman Catholic Church from its inception to its removal in 1649, when it was replaced with William II, Prince of Orange, the son of stadtholder Frederick Henry, and Amalia of Solms-Braunfels.

Edmund Spenser (1552 - 1599) was referring to the Temple when he wrote in Prothalamion (1596): '. . . Those bricky towers, the which on Thames broad aged back doth ride, wherein the studious lawyers have their bowers, And whilom wont the Templar knights to bide . . .'.

The knights Templar (established 1129 AD) became widely detested and only existed under that title for a short period, and were publicly disbanded in 1312, however as referenced in the poem of 1596 they remained in all but name under the Roman Catholic Church order without let, the real masters of the Templar, who established the modern adaptation of the Templar’s, with the Jesuit order (the soldiers of Christ (1534)), today the Jesuits are the largest order in the Catholic church, with almost 19,000 members. (See the 'Oath Of The Jesuits' )

The foundation of Roman law is a two tier legal structure, the original model being, Roman citizens, and none citizens, this is identified in the definition of a human being: a ‘Human Being’, also known as “Human”, is a term deliberately created in the 16th Century to update the naming of perpetual slaves to the Lords of the Land from the 13th Century term “Serf”. Human is derived from two Latin words humi meaning “land, soil, country, on the ground” and anus meaning “rectum, (marriage/pledge) ring, old”. Hence the word Human literally means “married/bound to the land/earth” and Human Being legally means “land creature” also known as chattel.

Ballentine's Law Dictionary (1930): human being: See MONSTER: Monster: A human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal. A monster hath no inheritable blood, and cannot be heir to any land.

This definition makes it clear, as a human being, you have no inheritable blood, and cannot own land; in the modern sovereignty system, you can own nothing of value, you are the keeper, and tax payer (lease payer), of your property, house, car, children, even yourself, you always remain under the legal ownership of the sovereigns, or those of inheritable blood.

You become a serf or monster of this country at birth, when your parents apply for a “certificate of live birth” this registers you as the possession of the state which places you upon a ship of commerce, this citizenship is used to bind a living man to the policy of the granting corporation as an incorporated legal entity. This gives presumption the government has control over you, which is why they allow themselves to charge you taxes, put you in prison, or make you follow their contrived laws. It gives them ownership over you, much the same as a Lord who owned his surfs and the land they worked. If they did not have a presumption of this type of control then they would not be able to tax you on your holdings. The tax is basically, what you owe the corporation for using their land, property, and infrastructure. You never truly own your property, which is why you are always, charged taxes, in effect rent upon it. The sovereigns can of course own land and property, and have blood lines that inherit, as the aristocracy, royalty, church hierarchy, the so called noble families, these are the owners in modern Roman law system, dominating the world today, while in reality these legal untouchables are the true criminals; noble in title only.

Before the clinic psychopath, depraved mass murderer, and thief William I (1066. Propagated as William the conqueror, but in truth known commonly to his peers as William the Bastard), the agent of the Roman Catholic Pope, England was split into many realms, and tortious relief through peer arbitration based upon the axioms of the land often labelled natural law, allodial land utilization and an honest monetary system existed throughout the realms ( You can see the coins of Albien here), no invented sovereign power could steal your lands or tax them.

From 1066, all that changed, the entire population of England was enslaved, no longer free men and women, they could own nothing and were subject to the dictates of a despot, as the first Catholic crusade swept over the people and lands of England, greedy for the wealth and property of its people and the ruthless extermination of all freedoms.

The new King installed a feudal system, he built castles throughout the lands, installing land barons imported from Normandy to subjugate the people, and over the next twenty years butchered almost all of the people, the purpose of this crusade for the Papacy was to remove the Islamic structures of society, whatever the professed religion, the physical evidence of coins suggests Islam from 750's. It was the natural law systems of society that threatened the death cult of the Roman Catholic Church; these freedoms could not be tolerated within the Vatican model of Christianity, exposing the frauds they established upon the populations in Europe, so they orchestrated the murder of the population of Albien (Britain), through the force of arms, the sword of contract murder, planned starvation and the destruction of everything that was found, beyond whatever was worth stealing. William the Bastards foreign feudal lords dominated the people, he removed all the inherent power and freedoms they had enjoyed before Catholic sovereignty arrived.

They established the fraud of ‘ownership’ and with it the Star debt system, of the Law Merchant, which is the basis of the modern system of admiralty law and the laws of negotiable paper (instruments), bankruptcy, insurance, and of sales, this is intermixed with Roman Law (the State is God), Maritime Law (international law of war and commerce) known today as the Uniform Commercial Code, all imposed to prevent men/women from gaining the protection of the true unalienable axioms of the land and the immutable protection of the inherent power of the individual, within the reciprocal responsibility and obligation each for the other, of a duty of care.

William the Bastard commissioned a catalogue of the papal sanctioned crowns new assets and called it the Doomsday book, because all belongs to the Crown, ultimately being the Papacy until the end of time. This book would have had little personal value to William as he was illiterate, but it allowed the newly created corporation to realise its assets. The monarchs soon felt threatened by the Church cult of Roman and established Mortmain, the dead man's hand, so people couldn't pass their land on to the church or anyone else without the King's permission.

To understand this period in history more please read, 'Rex Offa of Albien. (Britain)'.


The law of Mortmain also called the Statute De Religiosis, which has been connected loosely with the modern probate law, being a process by which property of a descendant is retitled. Probate is derived from the Latin probatus, meaning "a thing proven".


The original concepts of the Statute of Mortmain demonstrated the intention of a King to prevent the Church from acquiring lands in such a way that the king and other principle lords lost feudal services and dues.


A corporation, like the church could easily avoid rendering customary feudal services and payments. A corporation never rides out fully armed and prepared for battle in the service of an overlord. A corporation, civil or ecclesiastical, never dies intestate; its lands never escheat to an overlord. A corporation is never a minor heir; its lands are never administered by an overlord as a ward-ship. Unlike an individual, a corporation never seeks permission – or pays for permission – to marry. A corporation never dies; it never pays relief as the heir who seeks thus to reconstruct (relever) his ancestor's feudal contract with an overlord. So corporations results in the overlord, or king losing out substantially in revenues, in an ever escalating manor.


So if lands fell into the hands of a corporation without this statute, it was as if they were held in the hands of a dead man, the wealth of the lands remained with the dead man or corporation.


The Statute of Mortmain served, then, the interests of the king fully as much as those of the barons. Henceforth, while the Statute was enforced, no corporation, civil or ecclesiastical, could hold land in England except under certain conditions:

1 by a grant made prior to the Statute; or

2 by the authority of an act of parliament.


Mortmain as a Statue is now reversed, but as a term is still as it was, being a legal term that means ownership of real property by a corporation or legal institution that can be transferred or sold in perpetuity. It means corporations are excluded from the probate system of land use, and perpetuates the corporate state or Crown (Roman Catholic Church) ownership of the lands, and to utilise some land you must buy the lease on it, and pay tax (rent) to the crown upon the lease. The lease itself is not inalienable, and this is made clear from the modern probate, and eminent domain of the legal system.


They confuse people with the issue of lease ownership, people for example leaving their lands to the Church, or the state, when in truth, all they are leaving in this system is the purchased lease for the 'estate' or property, you are the 'tenant', land tenure means the landholder does not have absolute possession but derives the right from some other person. Tenure originates from its sense in feudalism; so used, tenure is the antithesis of allodial, being the absolute utilization of land or resources without obligation to others.


The conclusion of this is a prohibition upon the perpetual ownership of personal property (allodial land utilisation) for a flesh and blood individual of the indigenous population, and the absolute and perpetual ownership of everything contained within the country, as belonging to a corporate entity, being the Crown in the case of Britain.


William the Bastard (Conqueror), was named as man of the millennium on 24th December 1998 by the now late Cardinal Basil Hume head of the Roman Catholic Church in England, which was later confirmed by the Vatican.


During the middle Ages in England the church acquired the lease on substantial amount of real estate. As the church and religious orders were recognised as a legal person separate from the office holder who administered the church land (such as the abbot or the bishop), the land would not go to the king on the death of the holder, as the corporation of the church and the religious orders would not die, as an incorporeal legal entity never lived.

In addition, as the land was held in perpetuity, it would never escheat (ownership of the land reverted to the immediately superior feudal lord.) or pass by inheritance (and for the Church no feudal incidents or taxes would be payable upon it).

This was in contrast to feudal practice where the nobility (who were required to pay taxation for their lease) would hold land on grant from the king, who acted as the representative of the Crown Corporation, in return for service, especially service in war. This meant that the church over time gained a large share of physical land in many feudal states, and so was a cause of increasing tension between the church and the feudal administrators.

The Pope, as Vicar (substitute or representative embodiment) of Christ, claims ownership of everything and everyone on earth, as stated in the Treaty of Verona October 3rd 1213.

The Pope is known as 'Pontifex Maximus' which means Greatest Bridge-maker, high priest of the Ancient Roman College of Pontiffs, originally a college of the polytheistic state religions; the title emphasizes the civil authority of the Pope and the continuity of imperial power. This clearly demonstrates the Roman Empire never fell, but changed form, from a physical force of control, to the control of the minds of the people, subjugation of the mind is so much better at controlling the masses through force of arms.

In 1213 the feudal Barons, led by Stephen Langton the Archbishop of Canterbury, rebelled against the taxation and dictatorial system, and forced at the end of a sword, King John to sign the Magna Charta, establishing boundaries and redress for the feudal lords. In reality the Roman Cult had forced King John to sign over ‘ownership’ of England to them and required the King to be bound by legislation to hold him and his descendants to the contract.

Henry VIII dissolved the hold of the Roman cult, between 1536 and 1541, which release allowed the industrial revolution. The Roman Catholics Church were loan sharks to the sovereigns of Europe, but wished to expand their business to the lower ranks, and to regain control of Britain, so they repeatedly attempted to charter the Bank of England; the line of Stuart generation after generation refused, nothing succeeded, until the manufacturing of a civil war that finally saw King James I deposed then executed.


The English Civil War (1641–1651) was a series of armed conflicts and political machinations between Parliamentarians (servants of the Roman Catholic Empire) and Royalists (feudal lords loyal to the monarchy). The first (1642–46) and second (1648–49) civil wars pitted the supporters of King Charles I against the supporters of the Long Parliament, while the third war (1649–51) saw fighting between supporters of King Charles II and supporters of the Rump Parliament. The Civil War ended with the Parliamentary victory at the Battle of Worcester on 3 September 1651. (see the essay 'Rex Offa' for an explanation of these events)


The usury monopoly of the Church was now in the process of establishment, and subsequently to the 'Glorious Revolution' as it is known; later that century saw the establishment of a new line of ascension to the English throne with the banker William of Orange, this line was established only as Stewards, never monarchs. In truth William was Steward as the representative of the feudal Lords, never the people, of course all sovereigns by definition stand against the people.

This line of Stewards was installed by the Roman Catholic Church; William’s first act was to immediately charter the Bank of England.

The American Colonies were established by the feudal Lords and their Stewards, without Roman Catholic sovereignty, but with Roman Catholic support, and so the bulk of the revenue extracted from these colonies was not going to the Church, but to the feudal lords and monarch.

The English King and his Lords were greedy, conscienceless individuals, and their descendants remain so, who organised with the Roman Catholic Church against the indigenous population to claim dominion over the lands of America, by deceiving and murdering an estimated 100 million natives, the 'American Indians', as their exterminators titled them.

The Roman Catholic Church plotted against the feudal Lords dominion in America, and organised a rebellion against British rule in 1775.

The "Founding Fathers" deceived the colonists, and led them into a war against their own freedoms (limited as they were). They, the founding fathers, almost being members of the Bar (British Accreditation of Regency: which means, to officially recognize a person or organization as having met a standard or criterion as a person or group of people ruling on behalf of a monarch (representative of the Pope) who is unable to rule because of youth, illness, or absence, in person.), lawyers, trained and educated by the Roman Catholic legal structure, were all under the Pope's control. (See: Inherent Power)

Their lies and frauds would now affect the American colonies and the people who lived on the lands. They establish a sovereign model, and most importantly a corporate model, of politics, law, ownership and commerce. They removed allodial land rights, and put in place the same land ownership system, as was already established in Europe, the foundations of the destruction of all freedoms were laid within the confidence trick of the constitution.

They established the ten square miles within Washington DC, an area owned as an independent State by the Roman Catholic Empire, the seat of sovereignty and the location of the corporate organization and administration, for the exploitation and indoctrination of the American people. Established in 1790, and within the Constitution, it provides for a federal district, distinct from the states, to serve as the permanent national capital. The centres of all three branches of the federal government (federal means treaty: a formal contract or agreement negotiated between political entities).

They established eminent domain, upon the population, which is the power to compulsory purchase, or expropriate property, in corporate law it is the inherent authority of the sovereign State to seize a citizen’s (slaves) private property, expropriate property, or seize a citizen's rights in property with due fiat (money whose only value is a grant of perceived value from the State) monetary compensation, but without the utilizers consent. Not only land, but homes, cars, jewellery, gold anything they wish.

Templar law holds the peoples of the world in subjugation, while holding the sovereigns above reproach. For example: the criminal, and mass murderer, the secret Jesuit Tony Blair (also a member of the Temple Bar, as is his wife), manipulated and deceived, within his position of authority, empowered through the subjugated minds of the population, the extermination of over a million, mostly defenceless, man, women and children, he gave license to subjugated subordinates to go into the world and exterminate their fellow man with impunity, as he himself acts with impunity, demonstrated from the fact he has received no punishment, on the contrary he has been handsomely rewarded by his Jesuit and Zionist masters, who then placed him in defence of the Palestinian people, this a conscienceless slaughterer of his fellow man, who holds no regard for anything of value (i.e. a human life), a perfect choice for the sovereigns.

Just as the founding fathers of America were mainly lawyers who had received their ability to practice law under the Temple Bar of England, the companies which subjugated and ran other British Colonies were also orchestrated by lawyers of the Temple Bar.

It was all originally run and administered out of the’ ’City of London’, which contains two Enclaves, the inner and middle Temple, and administers its own laws. London was not founded by the Romans but originally established by King Llud of the throne of Lloegres- founder of Lundein (London) before 54 BC, it is now governed by the City of London Corporation, established as the surreptitious central authority of England by the Roman Catholic church, with the motto, ‘Domini dirige nos - O Lord guide us.’, also known as the Square Mile, or City, which is excluded as one of the 32 boroughs of London as it is an independent State, it is the police authority for the city, it also has responsibilities and ownerships beyond the City's boundaries.

The Square Mile of London is the Crown of England, the Sovereign Monarch, (originally the Steward: a care taker, just a representative spokesperson of the landed gentry), is subservient to its authority, as is the national government. The controlling power is split into three groups who were party to the Charter of the Bank of England, one third is held by the Monarchy, a third by the Roman Catholic Church in Rome, and a third originally the landed gentry who held the public shares; these were quickly stolen by the Rothschild family. The independent State of the City is the usury centre of the world, the independent State of the 10 square miles of Washington D.C is now the military centre, and the independent State of the Vatican the religious centre.

The Vatican is situated by the seven hills in Rome, west of the river Tiber, covering a total of 110 acres, in addition to this Castel Gandolfo, the papal summer palace outside of Rome, as well as other buildings located in Rome but outside the Vatican City, are endowed with extraterritoriality (exemption from the legal jurisdiction of Italy), the Vatican has a seat on the united nations as a sovereign state.

Their control is not total, but within a trinity of sovereignty, the old blood line Monarchs (like the Bush family, the Queen, etc.), the financial powers (like the Rothschild family, its members being the Clinton family, Adolf Hitler, Winston Churchill by marriage, etc.), these powers being both Zionist and Jesuit, the federal reserve is Zionist, the Bank of England was established by the Jesuits, but is now shared by the three sovereigns (parasites), the Queen, the Roman Catholics, and the Rothschild Zionists, and the final religious sovereign is the Roman Catholic Church itself.

The History of the British extends from around 1500 BC to the present day. There is no history of any nation on Planet Earth that has been so disgracefully abused and so completely distorted and mangled as that of the British Nation. The appalling mess that the 3500 years of British national record is now in is a National disgrace, and an intentional and premeditated undertaking to maintain and expand ignorance and confusion.

The Crown itself is a corporation sole (a legal entity consisting of a single ('sole') incorporated office, occupied by a single ('sole') man or woman), that represents the legal embodiment of the Executive Government. Like any corporation, the Crown is an artificial person (in this case, coextensive with a natural person, being the Black Pope) which can own property and has certain rights as provided by law to business entities. In the case of Commonwealth realms, the rights and powers of the Crown vary from state to state, because each national or state Crown is a separate corporation sole, generally incorporated to the original Crown structure. Note the use of titles to confuse and mislead the population, such as commonwealth, inferring common ownership, when none exists, or Bank of England which sounds part of the government, when it’s a private company.

In this model the Crown holds ownership of all the assets of the corporation, being the entire corporate entity of the nation under its incorporation. For example the Crown Jewels of England would belong to the Crown, as opposed to the sovereign head of state. Just as the public buildings and infrastructure do not belong to the population, but again to the Crown, further the very land of the entire nation is the property of the Crown, the concept of Federal lands in the US was developed in parallel to that of the Crown lands in Canada and Australia, being the sole property of the Crown corporation, even the ownership of the individual people of the nations are the property of the Crown, as they are incorporated upon registration of live birth, however the Queen as the head of state still retains reserve powers, but these powers are never exercised. (They present outwardly a fiction of the structure being a democracy, and placate the population with almost meaningless voting, having control over all parties, (a single party in effect), and they themselves selecting the candidates, this renders what small value extant in honest representative rule, entirely worthless).

The country is governed by servants of the Crown or its figure head of that State the monarch, having sworn an oath to serve the Crown, not an oath to serve the indigenous population, including prison warders and police officers who are directly employed by the Crown, and not by the Prison Service or Police Authorities. In a related way, there is the Crown Prosecution Service in the criminal courts whose lawyers are called Crown Prosecutors. They are a corporate enterprise operated by officers of the BAR Association, under military authority. That is why the non-incorporated people could never be judges, as they aren't lawyers who have been admitted to the BAR. And this is why a friend who happens to know a lot about the law can't represent you in court, for example.

Those working within the intelligence services such as MI5 and MI6 are also Crown Servants. Only Crown Servants sit as Members of Parliament, as if they refuse to swear an oath to the Crown, they would receive no pay for their office, while being still permitted to hold their office, but rendered impotent, also MPs receive on retirement, or a sinecure job (a paid job requiring no work).

This follows on to what they are paid in, being fiat money (meaning its value is only from the official sanction of the Crown, it has no intrinsic value), so the money in itself is a fraud, just a corporate certificate of debt. This fait money system now function almost without exception in every nation on Earth, enforced through the legal and political corporate establishments, as they make it a criminal corporate offence to create any currency in competition to the fiat system, they love monopoly, and function from a perspective of deception, extortion, and fraud.

The modern Sharia Law, of the Religion of Mohammedans.

Sharia means "way" or "path to the water source"; it is presented, in its contemporary form, as being the system of laws expressed within the Qur’an, when in truth it is the laws expressed in the old and new testament of the Jewish and Christian contrived books of religious sovereign control, and most shamefully on the unmitigated conjecture of Hadith (Hadith: un-provable opinion of hearsay).

This is compounded with misrepresentations, and incorporated into Sharia using the idea of Fiqh, (fiqh is an Arabic term meaning "deep understanding" or "full comprehension"), which is Islamic jurisprudence. Fiqh, in its present form, is an unjustified expansion of the Sharia Islamic law—based directly on rulings/interpretations of Islamic jurists (legal erroneous experts), largely based on Hadith.

This misunderstanding is further compounded, with the addition of a strange idea of fiqh that deals with the observance of artificial rituals, and unjustified social legislation. I say unjustified as the true Sharia Law of the Qur’an is only concerned with the purging of action of each individual that negatively impact on those around them, something that is absolutely disregarded in the existing system, resulting in the reality of the world today, filled with usury and subjugated minds, actively following sovereigns without reason, and failing to see the light, and truth of Islam.

Natural Law is true Sharia Law.

The historian Ibn Khaldun describes fiqh as "knowledge of the rules of Allah (not God, The Creator), which concern the actions of persons who own themselves (free of sovereignty), bound to obey the law (the innate inherent power of the individual, each is born with, of a reciprocal responsibility and obligation to all those around you, expressed through axioms of the land as a duty of care, this is the Qur‘anic natural law), respecting what is required (by the Qur‘an, not by a contrived religion of men) (Waiib), forbidden (Haraam), recommended (Mandub), disapproved (Makruh) or merely permitted (Mubah)".

Firstly I will express an aspect of understanding the Qur’an, if a verse of the Qur’an states a concept or principle, that concept or principle applies to every single verse of the Qur‘an, throughout the entire Qur’an, it never changes, it never reduces or increases in relevance, it is a constant understanding.

For example:

There shall be NO COMPULSION in the Deen. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in taghut and believes in Allah (Not God, The Most Merciful) has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah (Not God, The Sustainer) is hearing and knowing. (Surah 2 - 256)

So the concepts and principles in this verse can be applied to every other verse, meaning in Islam there is no Compulsion to perform any ritual, or social mandate, cultural doctrine, religious dogma, or sovereign dictate; to shape Sharia law to enforce these none Qur’anic values of compulsion, enforcing practices and obligations as Law, is in itself a crime, and demonstrates the true lack of knowledge of Islamic law, now used, originating from the minds of ignorant men, not the wisdom of the Qur‘an.

You are directed not to follow or accept, as true or worthwhile, anything Taghut: meaning: superstitious beliefs, false objects of worship, like God (Allah (Not God, The Single Unity) does not require worship (non-action), but service (action)), idols, heavenly bodies (such as the moon or the sun, previously worshiped), spirits (such as the devil as a personification, Jinn as physically manifest fire creatures), human beings (as sovereigns, such as heads of states, Kings and Queens, religious hierarchies).

So in this verse it says these superstitions and objects of worship are not to be believed in as real or true, they are worthless to a Muslim, and should never be followed, accepted or valued. So in just one verse of the Qur’an, a great deal is expressed, and these ideas are never altered, they remain throughout the entire book.

We can understand the concepts clearly using this method of establishing the Qur’anic concepts throughout all verses, with the addition of two other ideas, firstly the use of the classical Arabic meanings of key words, not the Jewish/Christian meanings now utilised, and the absolute removal of any and every hadith, Christian or Jewish law ever manufactured, comprehensively cut from Sharia Law.

Natural law does not need legal experts, or a thousand volumes of text books filled with loop holes and technicalities, it needs no one who requires a year’s wages for a day’s work, or to lies on your behalf, or expresses third party lies against you.

Natural law is known within everyone, it may not be exercised, but it is in existence, within each rational being.

The concept of punishment is not Islamic; the purpose of arbitration is to establish ‘relief’ in dispute, not punishment. This relief must be stable, to demonstrate impartial equitable manners of conduct, decided upon the tort and the intention, by 23 rational independent individuals, male or female, of the local community, who must have the options and precedents explained to them upon conclusion of arbitration, a random rotation of individuals from the local community, of the 23, no judge is required, no legal expert, no sovereign powers, just the wisdom of 23 individuals to see the truth, based upon the axioms of the land, serving as part of zakat payment to the community. The court staff would administrate and organise the whole function, and administer the relief, the power held from the of full community would be held by the 23 selected for their short term of community service.

Some examples of Natural Laws:


Some food is expressed in the Qur’an as forbidden, such as carrion, blood and swine flesh, and animals dedicated to Gods, or idols, but this is not a law of Sharia that would repress the law of no compulsion, as an independent act, it has little effect on those around you, it damages your own body and mind, so to eat these things of your own free will is not a crime against the community at any level, only yourself, a crime without relevance to Sharia Law. In addition if you have no other options but to eat tainted or prohibited food, Allah (The Single consciousness) only judges intention, so no fault is found. It is an act of Makruh, a disliked or offensive act (literally "hated"), though it is not haraam.

If you physically insist/force others to eat Makruh against their will, this is a crime.

If you actively encourage with intimidation, others to eat Makruh against their better judgement, when it is not required, this is a tort (a wrongful act).

If you deceive them into eating something they would refuse if they knew what they were consuming, while knowingly feeding them unacceptable foods, this is a tort (wrongful act).

To intentionally decrease the amount of available food within the community, to maintain high prices, starve the people, oppress and dominate others, this is a tort.

To intentionally contaminate the food, with pesticides, herbicides, GM crops, etc., in its production, upon attempting to supply these contaminated foods for human consumption, would be a tort.

To intentionally contaminate the food with additives that poison, however slightly (as poisons accumulate, combine and disrupt), the people of the community, this is a tort.

These torts (wrongful acts) are very common in the world today, poisons are intentionally introduced, pervasive and escalating in the food chain, the food is tainted, this is a tort of Sharia (path to the water source: meaning the way to sustain and make fertile, a natural fruitful way) axiom, but a tort ignored by religious men who are blinded by religion and love to judge and subjugate others, without authority.

The demonstrated concept of the Qur’an to protect and maintain a sound purity of the food we eat, is never understood, it is viewed as a literal and very limited constraint upon the Muslim, this is the direct opposite understanding of its intent, it is a concept to maintain a pure and fertile food chain, it is not a constraint but a security and freedom to eat without fear, an inherent power of natural law, but one whose protection we are refused today.

The sovereigns engineer, and instigate the intentional contamination of our food supply, you may puzzle as to why, the pharmaceutical industry both develop and medicate the population with toxins, the medical profession are kept busy with the maintenance of these pollutants, dentistry thrive on the results of this corrupt and contrived system of contamination. (see ‘The Fraud of the Hospital System’)

They use the phrase, ’scientifically unsubstantiated health concerns’, no matter the body of evidence amassed against these poisons, and people look no deeper. As a rule of thumb if the sovereign establishment propagate their standard rebuttal, ‘scientifically unsubstantiated health concerns’, avoid that product at all costs, for a product to need to have that phase, or similar, in its defence condemns it out of hand.

Poisons like:

Mono Sodium Glutamate (MSG)


Sodium Fluoride (Toothpaste, mouthwash, water supply)http://www.greaterthings.com/Lexicon/F/Fluoride.htm Artificial sweeteners (Aspartame, Saccharine, Acesulfame K, Neotame, Sucralose, NutraSweet, etc.), they are very cheap for industry to use, and very, very bad for a human being to consume, the list of symptoms generated from the consumption of these toxic poisons is enormous, I advise you to investigate these products, and refuse to buy any foods containing them.


Hydrogenated Vegetable oils (Margarine, long life fats in commercial fast food preparations, etc.) http://www.natural-health-information-centre.com/hydrogenated-fats.html Propylene Glycol (used in soft drinks, and as an anti-freeze) Although exposure to high levels of Propylene Glycol is known to cause serious and potentially irreversible health conditions, the chemical industry tell us that "small" quantities or low level exposure of Propylene Glycol is "safe" to use on the skin and in food. Serious exposure causes liver and heart damage, and damage to the central nervous system if sufficient is absorbed by the body, these toxins not only accumulate over time but combine with the many other toxins we consume.

Food Additives: E-Numbers



Aluminium (coating salt and some other refined grained materials to prevent clumping, cooking pans, foils and containers, food packaging, a by-product of food manufacturing; it builds up in the body and leads to damaged brain function) Aluminium binds strongly within the body with Sodium Fluoride, it causes progressive loss of all mental powers - the powers to think, to remember and to reason.

This is just one example above, as expressed within the Qur’an, as the concept of vigilant preservation of the purity of all food consumed.

Land Rights.

Allah - there is no deity (God) except Not God, the Ever-Living, the Sustainer of existence. Neither drowsiness overtakes Allah nor sleep. To him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the Earth. Who is it that can intercede with Allah except by Allah’s permission? Allah knows what is before them and what is after them, and they encompass not a thing of Allah’s knowledge except for what Allah wills. Allah’s Kursl (chair or footstool, so the Creator is sat over) extends over the heavens and the Earth, and their preservation tires Allah not. And Allah (Not God) is the Most High, the Most Great. (Surah 2:255)

Within the Qur’an Allah present the concept of allodial land, by explaining exactly who is the owner of every planetary body, by stating whatever is in the heavens, this would include the Earth, Allah continues, establishing who is the owner of whatever is on the Earth, this establishes the concept of allodial land rights, and allodial mineral and food rights, to understand this concept further please read, ‘Allodial Earth'.

Theft: the crime of stealing someone else’s property.

The male thief, and the female thief, you shall cut their (three or more) hands as a punishment for their crime, and to serve as a deterrent from Allah (Not God). Allah ( Not God) is Almighty, Wise. (5:38)


[5:39]   If one repents after committing this crime, and reforms, Allah (Not God) redeems them. Allah (Not God) is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

To further understand this concept please read, ‘Theft and punishment’, the link: Usury: the premeditated theft of the fruits of someone else’s labour.

Many are confused as to what usury is, and what usury is not, but it is a very simple concept only confused by one thing, the desire to gain from usury while wishing to remain a Muslim.

All the Earth is allodial, as are the fruits of the Earth, for example if I plant a field of watermelons, the watermelons are the bounty of Allah, grown from the earth and out of the seed, and from the design of Allah, but the physical labour you invested in the planting of the seed, the preparing of the land, the harvesting and marketing of the watermelons, is what you have honestly earned and deserve in reward of your labour, so when you sell the watermelon, the watermelon itself is free, as it is the bounty of Allah, but the labour it took to reach its end user and consumer must be paid by the end user and consumer.

This is in contrast to usury, if I lent you a watermelon, and expect you to repay me two watermelons in return, I have laboured in the creation of the one watermelon, but I expect a second watermelon in return for no labour, I have extorted the fruits of your labour from you, because to create the second watermelon I must labour twice as much as you laboured in the creation of just one watermelon, and surrender that labour to you in reward for no effort on your part, this is usury.

Or if I demanded 10% of your crop in exchange for insuring it against loss, so I gambled you would have a good harvest, when the odds maybe only 1% of the time a crop is lost. This is a form of usury.

The Islamic model, protecting yourself from the hardship of a crop failure is simple. A group of farmers would join together, each committing a share of their crop into the collective pot, proportionate to the size of their holdings, only if a farm failed would any burden be extracted from the collective, otherwise the insurance would cost nothing. This loss burden sharing insurance could be linked across large group collectives of farmers, so reducing the burden through scale of any potential losses.

To sell a crop of watermelons at a discounted price before you have planted the seeds, and harvested, jumping straight to market, as is now commonly practiced through the futures market, is selling something you do not have, and may never have, you may only sell what you possess, to sell a potential is a form of usury, you are selling nothing now for the fruits of someone’s labour, for a price that if you deliver in the future would be for less than you have earned.

You shall give full measure when you trade, and weigh equitably. This is better and more righteous. (Surah 17:35)

You shall give full measure when you trade; do not cheat. (Surah 26:181)

You shall weigh with an equitable scale. (Surah 26:182)

These principles can be applied to any area of commerce, for example if you sign a contract to pay a set fee for a service, irrelevant to whether that service is used or not, say a gym membership contract, but never go, yet you cannot escape the contract period, this is a futures contract and a form of usury, any contract based on potential future use of service, as opposed to actual use is again not full measure for the fruits of your labour, so usury.

To understand these ideas further please read, ‘Human Energy'  , ‘Islamic Finance' , ‘Qur’anic Caliphate'.

 Sovereignty and subjugation

25:26 On that Day it will become obvious to all that the Sovereignty belongs to the Most Gracious alone. Hence, a Day of distress it will be for all those who had been rejecting the Truth.

You can have absolutely no sovereign, not even, if he lived, the messenger Muhammad, could, or would be, your sovereign.

A sovereign is a person you surrender your decision making ability over to, for example the government decide you must pay income tax (a form of usury) and if you are subjugated you do, without any power within your mind to refuse.

Or for example a sovereign decides to go to war and you must go to war, and this form of obedience is subjugation, you are subject to the dictates and opinions of another, accepted without question or refusal.

This means as a Muslim you can have no king, no sovereign Caliph, no centralised government, no human worship, religious or intellectual, no imams, no muftis, no sheiks, no mullahs, no presidents, no prime ministers, no representatives, voted or hereditary, no outside sovereign power you exist in subjugation to, at all.

[17:36]   You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them.

It would be a simple task to establish all the natural law concepts within the Qur’an, and establish true justice and freedom for all, whether Muslim or none Muslim, a believer in truth or a none believer in truth, no matter the shepherds each person carries, justice would not only be seen to be done, without inequity, but with reason and resolution.

 Active Image



Login Form

Lost Password?

Hijriah Date

Jamadil Akhir


Supreme Existence
God And Allah. Updated
The Meaning Of Life
Freedom Means Responsibility
This Earth Is Precious
Qur'anic Caliphate
The Truth
Human Energy
Spiritual Evolution.
The Five Pillows Of Islam.
Salat (Desire)
The Blinding Light Of Islam Extinguished.
Islam Demands Reason.
Islamic Finance.
The Unnecessary Energy Crisis: How to Solve It Quickly.
Time Explained.
The Misanthrope.
The HIV-AIDS Question.
A Debate On Money.
Chaos Transduced.
The Advent Of The Muslims.
Islam A Challenge To Religion.
Sweet Poison.
The Three Given Keys Of Existence.
Divine Spark.
The Heavens The Earth And The Qur’an.
Mohammad's Awakening.
The Engines of Creation.
A Dying Ember
Melded Multiple Infinities.
A Sadness Within Me.
The Dichotomy of humanity; the singular unity of being both Mortal and Immortal.
The purpose of humanities creation.
Interface With Islam
The potentials of Death.
Why the banks are failing.
The Subjugated Mind.
Allodial Earth.
CHAPTER 6 from the book "DESCENT into SLAVERY”
The Vatican.
Theft: Punishment or Relief
The Fractional Reserve Banking System.
The Symbols of Religion.
The Big Bang, a BIG lie.
The formation of a galaxy, evolving a universe.
Our Conscious Mind As An Electromagnetic Field
Hadith (part one).
Hadith Continued (part two).
Confessions Of English Spy Who Helped create Wahhabism.
The Detached.
Law of Men. (The First Crusade)
Rex Offa of Albien (Britain)
Constitution of Allah. Transfinite Consciousness.
The Human Soul Nexus.
The History of Arabic Grammar.
Why do the Innocent suffer, the answer.
A Careful Linguistic Analysis of the term Allah.
I skipped, and I danced, and I sang.
I am.
Who destroyed Alexandria Library?
The Empty Vessel.
Islam: What is the Quran and Sunnah? (Written in Arabic)
The Lie of Hijab. (Written in Arabic)
Human Energy Economic System.
Aspartame is Rumsfeld's Disease: A Politically-Induced Biochemical Disaster Of Global Proportions.
Polycentric Community.
Establishing Freedom of Evil at all Times within Bonded Community
Sovereignty is with Allah alone
University community model.
190 Lughaat-ul-Qur'an
Islamic Supermarket
Car Insurance.
Islamic repository
The Skill of Discourse
The Natural Rights Clothes Shop
Meanings of Terms of law
A simple Lexicon investigation of a single verse of the Qur'an
The Nature of Ownership.
Police State: What is a police Officer?
Free Energy Plasma Engine
Part One. The Writ
Part Three: Gemot Administrators of Terrente (the peace of their mind threatened) Relief
Part Four - Wite and Surety Bound-Souls
Eight point community plan
Equitable Allodial Utilisation (overview)
Proposed Method of Allodium Witnessed Declaration
Affidavit of Allodium Witnessed Declaration
‘Bona Gestura’ Bond of Allodarii
Notice of pursuance of Allodium Witnessed Declaration
Declaration of Allodial Utilisation
Polycentric community (overview)
The Substantive Binding Surety (overview)
Reciprocated Agreement of Binding Surety
Anarchic Labour Trading
The Repository (overview)
Bonded Cooperative Occupational System
Plenary Allodium Utilisation Averment
Cooperative Assurance System
Cooperative Car Assurance
Medical Assurance
Winters slave
The Nature of War
The Nature of Democracy
The Nature of Sovereignty
The Third State of Consciousness
Inherent Power (short overview)
Part Two: How a Substantive Gemot of Axiological Inherent Power Functions through Axioms of the Land
Part Five - Terrente - Duty of Care - Outcast
The Law, Courts and Jurisdiction
Repository Securities and Advance
The Nature of Copyright
The Nature of Government
The Nature of Capitalism
Islamic Banking
The Court System versus the Witena-Gemot System
A Duty of Care
The Trivium
The Concept and Structure of Polycentric community
The Nature of Economics
The Protected Paedophiles, Child Rapists, Child Torturers, and Child Murders of the British Establis
Arbitration of Universal Accountability - Terrente Relief
Unilateral Bond of Repository Administrator
The Nature of the Hospital System
Hemp Drugs Commission Report, completed in 1894
Unlawful Killing
A Bonded Militia
Duty of Care Trading Declaration (food)
Bonded Cooperative Networks
Freedom or Slavery
Matrimonial Agreement
Part Six - Relief, Recourse and the Jury
Part Seven - Constructive versus Substantive
The Education Assurance Bond
Predator and Prey
Francis of Assisi
Possession versus Utilisation of the Land
NOTICE: No Implied or inferred right of access
Crowd Funding
The Master of the Soul
The Nature of Money
What is voting?
What is a Citizen?
As Above so Below
Fencing (Austerity)
Jews and the Global Sex Slavery Business
Rise of Sea Levels is 'The Greatest Lie Ever Told'
The Nature of Death
The Singing Soul