Home arrow Matrimonial Agreement
Matrimonial Agreement PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 3
PoorBest 
Written by Abdun Nur   

Version 6 10th November 2015

Matrimonial Agreement

What is the purpose of matrimony?

The main purpose is for the benefit of offspring; children need stability, they need the love and support of both parents, they need a safe environment, and all their needs provided for until they are mature enough to fend for themselves. Matrimony (meaning ‘motherly behaviour’, which is an act anyone can express) is the agreement between the parents to bind both parties to that obligation.

The second purpose is in unity, combining the resources and efforts of the couple in the creation of a home.

The third purpose is in emotional protection, on the part of the woman from infidelity, abuse, hardship, abandonment; on the part of the man benefits of companionship, love, affection, commitment, loyalty, trust, and support, and vice versa.

The detrimental term ‘Marriage’ is hierarchical, meaning ‘marry age’, so of an age to marry, ‘marry’ means ‘male persona - to wed’, ‘Wed’ means pledge, a ‘Pledge’ is a bailment of goods to a creditor as security for some debt or engagement. There are two varieties of pledge; chattel and land. When you pledge in contract as a written, witnessed agreement you bail yourself as chattel to the creditor as security, becoming subject to their control. This means the one paid becomes the possession of the one paying, or the one providing security takes possession of the other.

Husband is an Old German word meaning “hus” and “bunda” - “house” and “owner”.

“Husband” originally had nothing to do with marital status at all, except that home ownership made husbands extremely desirable marriage partners in the 13th century.

Wife means ‘woman’; while a groom is someone who looks after horses. Not wild and free horses, but horses that are owned, tacked up and ridden or used, for show and for service. Horses that are broken and held in imposed servitude, when the groom wants to use them he fits a bridle (bridal), which is fitted into the horse’s mouth as a method of inflicting pain to control the horse.

Marriage is a contract, a contract is a positive law fiction; no living soul can be a party to a contract, as they are exclusively between legal fictions such as corporation, when you sign a contract it is as the representative of your straw man of citizenship, a legal fiction which makes a living soul the agent of a corporate fiction.

If you remove the fictions of contract, then agreement must be substantive, so free of all fictions, and reciprocal, so equitable, the inherent nature of written bindings demands a witnessed signed reciprocal agreement, meaning it binds both parties equally, unlike a contract which does not.

In contract you could for example bind one party to be in effect chattel, meaning property, where you could dictate upon them within the contract of marriage, but this would be impossible within natural reciprocal agreement.

Within a matrimonial binding the male may want, in the future, a second wife, and if so this would be a part of the original agreement or an amendment introduced later but signed by both parties with witnesses, and of course would be in reciprocation, this would mean his first wife would be able to take a second husband (even in advance of her husband if the stipulation was in place), and further so would his second wife as it would also be in reciprocation.

For example if the man wanted his wife to wear head covering as a stipulation within the agreement he would also be required to do so. If he required her to ask permission of him to leave the house, he would be required to ask permission of her if he wished to leave, etc.

Dowry

No ‘right’ can be established within any substantive agreement, as all rights are a grant from a superior to an inferior, this is not possible with equals, if you create a binding agreement you have a different structure to that which may exist within contract, within contract ‘bribes’ (given to persuade or induce - mahar) are called consideration.

Consideration is an inducement to enter into a contract. This is why prostitutes within the Wahhabi concept can be paid to enter into nikkah (matrimony) and are then divorced after the sexual acts have been completed, with keeping the mahar (bribe) shared by the prostitute, who is often a slave, and the pimp, through the contract concept as settlement. Mahar is not within the Qur’an.

This concept of dowry can be subverted further, where the family of the girl sell her into matrimony with a bride price, like you would sell an animal, prostitution networks in the various Wahhabi region purchase girls from parents to use as prostitutes using this bride price, and pimp the child out using short nikkah contracts through the mahar concept.

Control of the dowry belongs to the bride in theory; although in practice control often transfers to the husband and in-laws, and grooms sometimes extort large dowries. Dowry deaths are a widespread problem in Pakistan; often referred to as "stove deaths", to blame the deaths on accidents, they kill a bride by setting her on fire as the preferred method; this is the same in India. During 2004 to 2009, an estimated 3,379 dowry killings occurred in Pakistan.

If the dowry (contract bribe) is given where the bride pays the husband as a basis of a marriage contract, then "dowry murders" become even more common place, this occurs when a new wife is murdered by her husband or in-laws if they are unhappy with her, (or simply to steal the dowry), rather than sending her back to her parents, which would force the in-laws or husband to return the dowry to the bride's parents. Another aspect of this reversal of dowry in contract is the desire for parents to have male offspring, giving rise to the widespread murder of infant girls.

Divorce

There is no need of any ‘right’ to divorce, all natural agreements can be undone in the same manner they were established, this is inherent, no need to be granted anything. The agreement was created through a written agreement witnessed and signed by both parties and witnesses, and it is undone in the same manner. Neither party can deny the dissolution of the agreement if the original agreement has not been broken, an agreement in dispute cannot be dissolved.

A wife dissolving the agreement of matrimony cannot demand maintenance for herself but she can take half of all resources generated between husband and the wife within the period of the binding, this proportion is simple to establish if the resources of each party is detailed on the day the binding is established and again determined on the day of the dissolution of the agreement. The true purpose of the dowry is to subvert the reciprocation of the matrimonial agreement, by claiming the woman was paid in advance for the settlement of divorce, allowing the man to hoard all resources and leave the woman with little to nothing.

In the past the provider of resources was mainly the male, the female used the resources to create a home, clothe the family, feed them etc. Within the axioms of the land for this reason the father took the children as their main guardian, unless they were conceived outside of a written witnessed agreement, then the mother kept the children. With a community in place that fosters equity and prevents monopoly, usury and slavery, an equal division of responsibility could be established; the child requires both parents, and neither should be denied that responsibility.

The biological father is responsible for his children if they are proven to be his, in the case of no agreement being in place, or if disputed; only if one of the parents failed in their obligations and duty of care toward the child would sole protection be held. Children that have reached an age able to make rational choices may decide for themselves their main residence.

Breaking the agreement

Breach (the act or a result of breaking) of contract is a legal cause of action. Contract is an agreement between two constructed legal fictions and is not reciprocal, but both forms can be broken, the substantive is a binding agreement or bargain-for exchange that must be reciprocal, when these agreements are not honoured by one or more of the parties, in contract one party sues the other, similarly breach of reciprocal agreement incites relief, which maybe stipulated within the original agreement, so has no need of arbitration, or it is broken without being stipulated it must be established through arbitration.

Preferably if the agreement is broken the relief should be written within the binding, which is the yoke that ties the couple or group together. For example if the male beats the female (or vice versa) the binding is broken, the agreement no longer holds, it would void the binding, if the injured party wished to remain bound it would only be after relief of the tort (wrongful act) was established in full as stipulated within the binding, only then would it be possible for the binding to be reinstated solely at the discretion of the injured party.

If one party proved infidelity this would break the binding. If abandonment was proven by one party, that would break the binding. If subjugation and fear ruled over one party, imposed by the other, that would break the binding, etc.

Marriage License

A license exists as a grant from a superior to an inferior, accorded by a competent authority to solemnize (to observe with rites or formal ceremonies) the marriage contract, granting permission, and exists exclusively within the fictional ‘world’ of contracts. Licensing is imposed by those who maintain the fiction of government, being officers, those seeking offerings, who take away your inherent power to do a thing, and then sell it back to you for a price.

A license is used to author the union, and the author (issuer of license) controls that union. In some corporate States a bridegroom and bride must take blood tests before permission is authored by the agents of the State, additionally they are generally charged a fee to obtain a license, and they may have to declare their intention for a period of time in advance of the license being granted.

The marriage license originates from the Vatican Church Corporation, imposed upon Christians until the corporate system established the secular license diluting their monopoly and extending its application.

Many beg their superiors to grant them a fictional licence, for example gay marriage, where males marry males or females marry females, in reality they need no fiction or superior to grant them licence, they only need to enter into a matrimonial binding, as two consenting adults as long as they do not encroach upon any other, it is a private matter between themselves, in truth to impose restrictions upon others to prevent what you may dislike yourself, such as the idea of a man laying privately with another man in sexual congress,  is an encroachment against those souls that would be a tort (wrongful act) and they could seek relief of you.

The fruit of the union of a male and a female cannot innately exist between the union of a male and a male or a female and a female, therefore that fruit should not be given into the custody of such a union externally. The argument that they could make good parents is not relevant, as they have no innate capacity to produce offspring, unlike a barren heterosexual couple.

A Matrimonial Binding (Conceptualised within a bound community):

A binding is a self-imposed reciprocal agreement; it establishes the intentions of the couple toward each other before the yoke of the union is consummated. It details the specific relief that each tort (wrongful act) will demand if a breach of the agreement is committed.

Each binding can be unique to the parties involved, within a basic structure, a tort is a tort, and therefore it is within what relief each tort demands that variation may exist. A tort is any form of terrente; terrente is the peace of the mind threatened.

If the relief for a tort expressed is considered too extreme by either party they are free to refuse to sign the binding, but relief is only imposed if a tort is committed, if your intention is never to commit any tort then no relief, no matter how severe, should ever be worth concern, as all torts are done with intent.

In a substantive (meaning free of all fictions) system no hierarchy can exist, as a substantive structure stands by itself as a system without the need for superiors and inferiors, therefore if within your expressed relief for a particular tort, imprisonment is stated, the cost of that imprisonment rests upon the surety bondsmen of the culpable party, if no surety exists, or they have not the means or desire, then the cost rests upon the complainer or the charity of others, but not upon a fiction of a community, or any other external fiction of State, government, or corporation.

If relief is expressed beyond the physical abilities of the injured party and culpability is proven, then a rex (meaning to put a wrong to rights) can be hired to execute such relief through a warrant (‘to guarantee as true’ the notification (writ)) of the terrente through the Witena-Gemot. A terrente is a wrongful act that causes mental distress or discomfort, or tortious injury, against another through a proven intentional action. No fiction of any sort, such as corporation, State, or government can therefore suffer a tort, as they have no mind to either suffer or inflict distress.

The relief stated within this binding can be tailored specifically to the couple entering the union; in the example below the relief presented can be made more severe or less, and other actions can be added that the couple consider torts. The details of the tortious acts presented can also be increased to provide greater clarity if desired.

Betrothed means ‘be the act of truth’; Carnal means ‘of the flesh’; Union means ‘action of joining one thing to another’: “Be the act of truth to the flesh, joining one to the other in binding agreement”.

Betrothed Carnal Union Binding Agreement

“Be the act of truth to the flesh, joining one to the other in binding agreement”.

Binding reference number (as a ref. to the local doc. depository)

Date ____________

None in substantive agreement can be in legal name, but referenced in substantive print of thumb, finger, hand or other impression, that can be verified indisputably.

Bridegroom (First, middle reputation son/daughter of father’s first reputation)

Bride (First, middle reputation son/daughter of father’s first reputation)

Witnessed by (First, middle reputation son/daughter of father’s first reputation)

Witnessed by (First, middle reputation son/daughter of father’s first reputation)

1.     I expressly reserve all innate liberties, with all my inherent powers preserved and retained, universally and equitably binding upon all as reciprocal obligations and responsibilities, this reservation encompasses the unalienable and immutable innate axioms expressing inherent power substantively, inexorably binding upon every living soul, and is without prejudice.

I MAKE OATH, I DO SOLEMNLY, SINCERELY AND TRULY DECLARE AND AFFIRM AND SAY THAT:

Bridegroom:

2.     I, who shall not be with legal name, the bridegroom, make clear I am an adult born (Date of birth (over 18)) and through the assertion of my innate inherent power expressed as a reciprocal obligation and responsibility I now declare that I will stand surety for (brides reputation), here expressed through a clear and composed mind, competent of reason and intellectually sound. I will show respect and affection, give honour and equity as far as I am able, I will defend and protect, love and cherish till death takes me or death takes her.

I declare without equivocation that I have no standing agreement with any other living soul to be the act of truth to the flesh, joined one to the other in binding agreement.

3.     I am an unfettered soul, a liberated living anima of flesh and bone in my proper tangible form defined on my own behalf entering this binding free of any compulsion. I have never committed adultery, used prostitutes or pimped for them, or been the customer of a prostitute; further I have never committed murder, torture, fraud, rape, kidnap, domestic assault, dominating subjugation of another and do not practice necrophilia, paedophilia, bestiality, homosexuality, masochistic or sadistic practice’s, or sodomy. (See clause 22)

4.     I am of higher emotion as distinct from a clinical psychopath or socio-path who is fully aware of their absence of empathy, compassion and conscience, a situation of emotional absence that if concealed prevents and precludes me from making written, witnessed agreement in binding to any empathic soul of the family of Adam, and if this base condition is discovered to be the case in the future, it will render this binding in breach and me liable for providing the stated relief for such a breach upon the binding.

5.    Clause: Psychopath or Sociopath. Relief obligated of suppression of psychopathic or sociopathic state: all bindings within the community are rendered void, and in breach, all relief obligated from such a breach to be satisfied upon each binding. All immovable resources become the exclusive resources of the wronged party (spouse) after the settlement of all reliefs. The psychopath or sociopath must as quickly as possible withdraw from the community permanently, coming no closer than 100 miles of the spouse’s community under relief of becoming extorted and outcast, stripped of all possessions and deposited unclothed at any random location at the extremes of distance. All communities of empathic souls would be informed immediately of the soulless psychopaths hidden state, his image, thumb and fingerprints would then permanently stored by all for future reference. All resources are forfeit to the wronged spouse, including all resources held before the Betrothed Carnal Union Binding Agreement, as detailed within the appendix of held assets, including the immovable resources which are also forfeit to the wronged party in relief. The psychopathic (soulless) cannot be in community with the empathic (souled).

Proven Assets of bridegroom on this date attached on appendix A

Bride:

6.    I, who shall not be with legal name, the bride make clear I am an adult born (Date of birth (over 18)) and through the assertion of my innate inherent power expressed as a reciprocal obligation and responsibility I now declare that I will stand surety for (bridegrooms reputation), here expressed through a clear and composed mind, competent of reason and intellectually sound. I will show respect and affection, give honour and equity as far as I am able, I will defend and protect, love and cherish till death takes me or death takes him.

I declare without equivocation that I have no standing agreement with any other living soul to be the act of truth to the flesh, joined one to the other in binding agreement.

7.     I am an unfettered soul, a liberated living anima of flesh and bone in my proper tangible form defined on my own behalf entering this binding free of any compulsion. I have never committed adultery, used prostitutes or pimped for them, or been the customer of a prostitute; further I have never committed murder, torture, fraud, rape, kidnap, domestic assault, dominating subjugation of another and do not practice necrophilia, paedophilia, bestiality, homosexuality, masochistic or sadistic practice’s, or sodomy. Further I do not suffer from any sexually transmitted disease. (See clause 22)

8.     I am of higher emotion as distinct from a clinical psychopath or socio-path who is fully aware of their absence of empathy, compassion and conscience, a situation of emotional absence that if concealed prevents and precludes me from making written, witnessed agreement in binding to any empathic soul of the family of Adam, and if this base condition is discovered to be the case in the future, it will render this binding in breach and me liable for providing the stated relief for such a breach upon the binding.

9.     Relief as detailed in clause paragraph 5.

Proven assets of bride on this date attached on appendix B

10. Clarification: In this binding both parties, bridegroom and bride, are bound upon the yoke of mutual bondage, one to the other, as the union of two living souls derives from the imperative of nature; equity protects that union through this written reciprocal binding agreement. A binding written as a witnessed agreement in equity, not coition (sexual intercourse), comprises nuptials or matrimony, and no one can give agreement before consensual age (over eighteen year). To have sexual relations with a child is an encroachment upon them, and would be fiercely and mercilessly remedied by the Witena-Gemot of Record in natural equity, fulfilled through the peace makers championing the cause of the weak, and demanding substantive relief in full, relief if proven being the chemical neutering and methods of sexual suppression and sexual dysfunction imposed, forfeiture of all possessions, breaking of all binding agreements, and being permanently outcast from all empathic communities. (If a second child were found to be abused after this relief the summary execution of the offending paedophile would be the only solution remaining.)

11. Clause: Progeny responsibility. The father bound within the written conjugal binding has the guardianship of his son/s or daughter/s in natural equity, and this is inseparable and cannot be waived (unless he concede custody to their mother while he is always financially liable), a father's reciprocal obligation and responsibility to the custody of his own children being founded on his innate commitment of guardianship; meaning the care, protection and defence of that child. This honour being withdrawn if the opposite deed is demonstrated, when they may be severed from him, and put beyond harm, into the protection of their mother, relief must be established through both the innate protection unalienably held, of the inherent power of the child themselves, and the authority declared within this binding. Access to the progeny of the secondary guardian must not be restricted or denied if equitably requested and reasonable to achieve, where no inequitable actions have demonstrated risk.

12. Clause: Unfit parents. Where no parent is deemed fit, as argued by any who would stand champion of the weak or defenceless, as established within an equitable Witena-Gemot of arbitration in full community. If proven the peers of the Witena-Gemot would place any child in the custody of another, ideally a more removed family member or if none volunteer or are deemed suitable, then to another proven competent and willing, who could under the protection of the community in equity, provide true guardianship for them. If a child is wrongfully taken from a fit parent and given to some other adult, it is a form of human trafficking, and an abomination in the eyes of equity, only a natural equity Witena-Gemot, made up of a full community of peers, being twenty three tangible souls in discourse, can determine the disputed guardianship of a child, based upon clear torts and violations of the terms of guardianship, but without imposing undue restriction upon parental liberty and family autonomy.

13. Clause: Divorce. At any time either party may dissolve this binding in the same manner it was created, simply by writing ‘equitable dissolution of binding’ across each page with it signed with thumb print and witnessed by two signatory witnesses, neither party can equitably deny or prevent such a dissolution, to do so would constitute a tort, and oblige relief, the costs incurred from seeking equitable arbitration, and if forced to appear the cost of the wite for the rex service, are all born by the one opposed to the dissolution.

The assets accrued between the couple over the period of the union are equitably divided equally, determined through establishing those resources by examining the appendix of original resources, which remain with the original holder, and then assessing the increase, reasons for divorce that are nonviolent and simply a betrayal of trust such as infidelity, subjugation, or dishonesty are given relief through divorce.

14. Clause: Physical attack. This is a tort in binding and out, and can be given relief in both binding and in Witena-Gemot arbitration. This is a fundamental breach of binding, this dissolves the binding, written across the pages of the binding ‘breached and void’, signed by the injured party and two witnesses. Beyond this it must be proven to establish relief, physical injury supported by evidence of who is responsible, a rex along with those who champion the cause of the weak can be called in defence of the weak within the militia binding concept, to protect and put an end to the violence.

All binding holders in written binding with the attacker must be informed of the tortious actions committed, this obscene manner of conduct reflects upon the true nature of the soul committing it. See clause 13 for divorce.

Clarification: The tortious actions of physical assault, bodily injury, and grievous bodily harm, must be given relief through the equitable Witena-Gemot of record, through a community of peers in jury to determine the substantive relief for the protection of the injured party. Having demonstrated they are a physical danger to the weak and vulnerable, they are a danger to those around them, and as such the community must be able to establish relief from such acts and potentials. (See ‘Bonded Militia’)

15. Clause: Rape. This is a tort in binding and out, and can be given relief in both binding and in Witena-Gemot arbitration. No one can force another to perform any sexual act, even someone in the bindings of matrimony. If rape is perpetrated the victim can seek the protection of the Witena-Gemot, the binding is in breach, and made void and clause 13, divorce, is applied.  The victim can seek tortious relief through the Witena-Gemot directly, which will enforce the binding in addition to the innate relief rape mandates upon the proving of the tort.

16. Clause: Fraud. This is a tort in binding and out, and can be given relief in both binding and in Witena-Gemot arbitration. This is a betrayal of trust, and is a breach of binding; it is at the discretion of the wronged party to decide if that breach dissolves the binding through clause 14.

The wronged party must receive twice the amount of resources taken through fraud from the fraudster or their surety bondsmen. If taken to arbitration they must pay the costs of arbitration if found culpable, plus whatever the jury of peers conclude in relief.

17. Clause: Bigamy. It is not equitable to have two or more wives or husbands at one time, in doing so you break the written, witnessed conjugal binding agreement established here with the original wife or husbands, and the injured party/s can seek relief from the Witena-Gemot of Record in equity. (Unless the ability to marry more spouses is explicitly asserted here within the original written, witnessed agreement of matrimony, with any parameters included; if the agreement is in place it must apply to both parties, as all are equal, and all aspects of written, witnessed agreement are reciprocal, so both the husband and the wife would have equal ability to take a second spouse, with full disclosure to all involved, meaning that any further spouse/s were fully aware of the original written, witnessed binding agreement and also able to take a second spouse in reciprocation.)

To take a second wife or husband without explicate written reciprocal agreement in place, providing signed witnessed consent of the existing spouse, constitutes bigamy, the relief obligated by such a tort renders this binding in breach, making the binding void. All assets and resources are divided as detailed within clause 13 divorce. The wronged party also becomes the primary guardian for any progeny, as the bigamist has demonstrated dishonesty, untrustworthiness and betrayal. Additionally the bigamist must apprise all future spouses of their bigamy, before entering into binding agreement, including this one, failure to disclose this information confers an additional 25% of their total resources on top of their equitable divorce settlement.

18. Clause: Infanticide. A child in the womb is considered born, whenever there is a question of a benefit to the child, so equity protects the child from formed fetus, and treats the life as full and mature, to terminate a life within the womb encroaches upon the child, additionally to intentionally poison, or damage the environment of the fetus encroaches on the child. Finger prints are formed in the embryo at the fourth month, around 17 weeks, and remain fixed and distinct throughout the life of the living soul, additionally spontaneous, disconnected neural activity can be observed starting about week 17, this marks the cut-off point as the soul can suffer mentally, before this it may be argued the fetus is not a conscious soul, but beyond this the fetus is a distinct soul with full inherent power. It would be impossible to argue at 17 weeks of gestation the soul did not gain the full protection of the community; it is more than possible to argue the child is protected earlier, anywhere from 8 weeks. Abortion does not make a woman un-pregnant, it just makes her the mother of a murdered baby, it is therefore those who champion the causes of the weak, those who stand in defence of the defenceless infant, that must convince a jury of their peers, at what earlier point the child is afforded the same protection from all tortious acts imposed upon, protections that are afforded to any other living soul, and would include even malicious acts committed prior to 17 weeks, or whatever stage of development is considered formed, that manifest or affect the infant as a full soul.

19. Clause. Abandonment. After a period of one year of abandonment, the requirement of the signature of the absent party is negated, and at the bequest of the abandoned this binding can be dissolved, with the resources of the missing party determined at the original point of abandonment and recorded, these resources retained and remaining for the usage only of the abandoned party, but that usage cannot be the detrimental neglect, forsaking, or destruction of those resources. This then leaves the abandoned party free to enter matrimonial bondage with another. After a period of 5 years, after all reasonable efforts have been made and all avenues exhausted to locate the missing party, then all the resources of the absent party are distributed in accordance with their last recorded will and testament. If no will has been written, their resources are distributed according to the following stipulations: See appendix C

20. Clause. Incest. This is a tort in binding and out, and will be given relief in both binding and in Witena-Gemot arbitration. All bindings within the community are rendered void, and in breach, all relief obligated from such a breach to be satisfied upon each binding. All immovable resources become the exclusive resources of the wronged party (spouse). The obscene sexual pervert must be held securely until they can be taken before the Witena-Gemot, to have all actions examined by a full community of their peers, and the relief established through their consensus decision. After all relief has been satisfied, assuming they survive their actions, the obscene sexual pervert must withdraw from the community permanently, coming no closer than 100 miles of the spouse’s or their progenies community under relief of becoming extorted and outcast, if that is not already imposed upon them through Witena-Gemot arbitration, in which case the execution of that extorted nature with prejudice will be imposed upon them. All resources of the obscene sexual pervert are forfeit to the wronged party in relief. The cost of their imprisonment must be borne by the bondsmen they hold in surety and they themselves must labour to support their own captivity, or exist totally dependent upon the charity of their surety, which if absent would result in their providing for themselves or taking the charity of other if given; they would be given a small area of land within a secure space allowing them to cultivate their own food and provided a shelter from the elements. They are not extorted, unless directly made so, so retain the protection of torts from any others in captivity with them or those externally.

21. Clause. Infidelity/Adultery. This is a tort of betrayal and a breach of this binding, making it void, see clause 13 for divorce, if this results in the infection of a sexually transmitted disease, then additionally this is a physical assault, and in the case of incurable conditions grievous bodily harm and should be addressed as detailed in clause 14. Infidelity is an emotional betrayal that humiliates the victim, as such the relief should likewise cause the same emotional state in the guilty party, a public notice posted in a local newspaper and on local public notice boards with a photograph of the faces of the adulterers exposing the actions of the adulterer and their lover, and the informing of all those in binding with the adulterer as to their untrustworthy nature.

22. Clause. Failure to disclose perversion or true nature. If any sexual perversion or the true nature that is prevalent is not disclosed within this binding, being intentionally hidden, when it has been practiced in the past, constitutes a deception and a misrepresentation; it must be disclosed within the binding in writing before it is signed, so allowing the other party to enter this binding privy to all the facts. Failure to disclose such activities, if proven, voids the binding, see clause 14. Divorce with the addition of all resources created jointly after the creation of this binding going to the wronged party exclusively.

The burden of all costs associated with this binding, fall upon the one exposed for their deception/s, as do all the costs associated with dissolution of the binding, and the redistribution of resources. Primary guardian of any progeny goes to the wronged party.

Active Image
 

Login Form






Lost Password?

Hijriah Date

Jamadil Akhir
6
Thursday
1439 HIJRAH

Articles

Supreme Existence
God And Allah. Updated
The Meaning Of Life
Freedom Means Responsibility
Sovereignty
This Earth Is Precious
Qur'anic Caliphate
The Truth
Human Energy
Spiders
Seeds
Spiritual Evolution.
The Five Pillows Of Islam.
Salat (Desire)
Contemplation.
The Blinding Light Of Islam Extinguished.
Islam Demands Reason.
Believers.
Islamic Finance.
The Unnecessary Energy Crisis: How to Solve It Quickly.
Time Explained.
The Misanthrope.
The HIV-AIDS Question.
INDUCTION AND EXTREME OATH OF THE JESUITS
A Debate On Money.
Chaos Transduced.
The Advent Of The Muslims.
Islam A Challenge To Religion.
Sweet Poison.
The Three Given Keys Of Existence.
Divine Spark.
The Heavens The Earth And The Qur’an.
Mohammad's Awakening.
The Engines of Creation.
Dua.
Hamd.
Iblis.
Rage.
A Dying Ember
Melded Multiple Infinities.
A Sadness Within Me.
The Dichotomy of humanity; the singular unity of being both Mortal and Immortal.
Salaam.
Saum.
Shirk.
The purpose of humanities creation.
Interface With Islam
The potentials of Death.
Why the banks are failing.
The Subjugated Mind.
Allodial Earth.
THE BEGINNING OF THE LIE
CHAPTER 6 from the book "DESCENT into SLAVERY”
The Vatican.
Theft: Punishment or Relief
Love.
I’bada
Life.
The Fractional Reserve Banking System.
COSMOS WITHOUT GRAVITATION
The Symbols of Religion.
The Big Bang, a BIG lie.
The formation of a galaxy, evolving a universe.
Our Conscious Mind As An Electromagnetic Field
THE GEOMETRY OF SPACE
Hadith (part one).
Hadith Continued (part two).
Confessions Of English Spy Who Helped create Wahhabism.
The Detached.
Law of Men. (The First Crusade)
Rex Offa of Albien (Britain)
Constitution of Allah. Transfinite Consciousness.
PENTECOSTALISM.
THE REAL REASON WHY WOMEN HAVE BEEN OPPRESSED
The Human Soul Nexus.
The History of Arabic Grammar.
Why do the Innocent suffer, the answer.
A Careful Linguistic Analysis of the term Allah.
I skipped, and I danced, and I sang.
I am.
Who destroyed Alexandria Library?
The Empty Vessel.
Islam: What is the Quran and Sunnah? (Written in Arabic)
The Lie of Hijab. (Written in Arabic)
Human Energy Economic System.
Aspartame is Rumsfeld's Disease: A Politically-Induced Biochemical Disaster Of Global Proportions.
Polycentric Community.
Establishing Freedom of Evil at all Times within Bonded Community
Sovereignty is with Allah alone
University community model.
190 Lughaat-ul-Qur'an
Islamic Supermarket
COMPLAINTS OF CONVERTS
Car Insurance.
Islamic repository
The Skill of Discourse
The Natural Rights Clothes Shop
Meanings of Terms of law
A simple Lexicon investigation of a single verse of the Qur'an
The Nature of Ownership.
Police State: What is a police Officer?
Free Energy Plasma Engine
Riba
Part One. The Writ
Part Three: Gemot Administrators of Terrente (the peace of their mind threatened) Relief
Part Four - Wite and Surety Bound-Souls
Eight point community plan
Equitable Allodial Utilisation (overview)
Proposed Method of Allodium Witnessed Declaration
Affidavit of Allodium Witnessed Declaration
‘Bona Gestura’ Bond of Allodarii
Notice of pursuance of Allodium Witnessed Declaration
Declaration of Allodial Utilisation
Polycentric community (overview)
The Substantive Binding Surety (overview)
Reciprocated Agreement of Binding Surety
Anarchic Labour Trading
The Repository (overview)
Bonded Cooperative Occupational System
Plenary Allodium Utilisation Averment
Cooperative Assurance System
Cooperative Car Assurance
Medical Assurance
Winters slave
The Nature of War
The Nature of Democracy
The Nature of Sovereignty
The Third State of Consciousness
Inherent Power (short overview)
Part Two: How a Substantive Gemot of Axiological Inherent Power Functions through Axioms of the Land
Part Five - Terrente - Duty of Care - Outcast
The Law, Courts and Jurisdiction
Repository Securities and Advance
The Nature of Copyright
The Nature of Government
The Nature of Capitalism
Islamic Banking
The Court System versus the Witena-Gemot System
A Duty of Care
The Trivium
The Concept and Structure of Polycentric community
The Nature of Economics
The Protected Paedophiles, Child Rapists, Child Torturers, and Child Murders of the British Establis
Arbitration of Universal Accountability - Terrente Relief
Unilateral Bond of Repository Administrator
The Nature of the Hospital System
Hemp Drugs Commission Report, completed in 1894
Unlawful Killing
A Bonded Militia
Duty of Care Trading Declaration (food)
Bonded Cooperative Networks
Freedom or Slavery
Matrimonial Agreement
Part Six - Relief, Recourse and the Jury
Part Seven - Constructive versus Substantive
The Education Assurance Bond
Predator and Prey
Francis of Assisi
Possession versus Utilisation of the Land
NOTICE: No Implied or inferred right of access
Crowd Funding
The Master of the Soul
The Nature of Money
What is voting?
What is a Citizen?
Homeless
As Above so Below
Fencing (Austerity)
Jews and the Global Sex Slavery Business
Rise of Sea Levels is 'The Greatest Lie Ever Told'
The Nature of Death
The Singing Soul