Home arrow Arbitration of Universal Accountability - Terrente Relief
Arbitration of Universal Accountability - Terrente Relief PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 12
Written by Abdun Nur   

Version 5 – 9th 24th December 2015

Active Image

Arbitration of Universal Accountability - Terrente Relief

All modern systems originate and remain within the ‘Feudal World’. ‘World’ means ‘age of man’.

"The World" does not refer to the Earth or "The Planet", "The World" is the commercial construct of money, business and corporations; age meaning, to be a legal man given rights and duties, ‘man’ originally meaning ‘to garrison’, in this use meaning "to take up a designated position on a ship", with the counterpart of man a womb-man. A ‘-ship’ is a state or condition ordained, for example ‘citizen-ship’. The ‘whirled’ spun around!

Man is labelled from Ho·mo sa·pi·ens - rational man, the species of bipedal primates to which modern humans belong, ‘human’ is a derogatory term created to replace serf, and having the same meaning of slave,  man therefore means in effect rational slave. Slavery is a form of living death; “the world” is founded on fictions, assertions that facts exist that are known not to exist; made by authority of law to bring a situation within the operation of the rule of positive law. If a lie is viewed as dead and the truth living, the world is exclusively for the dead.

Let us redefine the terms from the dead to that of the living. A much better term to define what is termed ‘man’ would be in Latin “Ratiocinationis Anima” meaning- ‘ reasoning soul’ or ‘soul of premeditation’; or “inventivum anima” inventive soul’; a shortening to ‘anima’ – ‘soul’, which is the root of animated and animal. “Anima” is the inner consciousness that is turned toward the unconscious of the individual, in direct contrast with persona, the fiction of the person; “Animas-kind” the family of the living soul.


If you wish to converse in court, you must define your terms, and clearly comprehend the terms used against or toward you, as the first weapon of choice of the accumulated wealth elite is the slavery enforced through the many forms of positive law.

The term ‘law’ is a solemn expression of the “legislative power”. It orders and permits and forbids. (Black’s law dictionary page 700) Law is a term exclusively defined as imposed authority of corporate policy, in direct opposition to inherent power, which function upon protective axioms free of orders, permits and prohibitions.

In the 12th Century, Nicholas Breakspeare (born 1100) the true "Father of English" also known as Pope Adrian IV (Pope from 1154 to 1159) was instrumental with King Henry II (1133 – 1189) in the formation of a uniquely "English" brand of hybrid Anglaisé-Latin to form the legal framework of English. The foundation of the Roman cult of law within Britain, of a two tier legal structure, was first introduced by the Roman Catholic knights Templar, who established the Temple bar 10 February 1185. The bar is a "stake or rod of iron used to fasten a door or gate,” to hold the contents secure. (See the ‘Law of men’)

What is Positive Law?

In Britain the origin of the term ‘Law’ that arrived in the 12th century originates from the 3rd Century BCE Latin lāres - "a group of ancient Roman deities (gods) defining localized activities, customs and practices accumulated over time including (but not limited to) home, family, the state, the sea, land and travel".  

This was redefined in the 12th Century English lārs - "a collection of common doctrines, customs and practices accumulated over time; and the teaching of such customs".

Later in the 16th Century to lore/law - "A collection of rules (doctrines), customs and practices (accumulated over time) enjoining or prohibiting certain action".


Contrary to misleading information, the Ancient Roman Legal System never considered the customs of lāres as being other than religious doctrine and ancient superstitions (the casting of ‘spells’). Instead, the Roman Empire was founded on lēx/lēgis (statutes) and later (under Constantine) ilex (universal statutes).

The modern western legal systems of nations are therefore based on inferior lāres --religious doctrines and concepts designed by the Roman Cult--while the Roman Cult reserved for itself the formal structure of superior lēx/lēgis in the form of covenants and contracts such as Concordats, Official Church Councils and Papa; Bulls.

The doctrines of law were both imposed and invented by the ‘Landlords’ of the Feudal system, attested by jurisdiction, which is founded upon the fiction of ownership, so defined by land boundaries.

A Lord is a superior imposed through military force over inferior souls in might. The original meaning of ‘Lord’ loaf-ward from loafer, a variant of land loper, Ger. Landläufer "vagabond," from "land" + Läufer "runner,"from laufen "to run".  The term vagabond is derived from Latin vagabundus, denoting a criminal. So ‘Lord’ originally meant a wandering criminal on the land.

The true term, that law is used in place of, is ‘Axiom’, meaning a self-evident truth that requires no proof, a universally accepted principle or rule. The axioms of the land, the natural axioms, that all of “Animas-kind” the family of the living soul are bound by is unalienable and immutable across the entire earth.

The Feudal System

Feudalism was perfected by the Normans, and imposed through the Vatican who wanted that model universally applied. Feudalism was conceptualised in 847 within the edict given at Mersen contained the following clause: “Every free man shall be allowed to select for himself a lord, either the king or one of the king’s vassals; and no vassal of the crown shall be obliged to follow the king to war, except against foreign enemies” This is a statement of enslavement, every free man must have an owner, every owner is owned by the King, this required the giving of an oath of fealty, giving someone ownership of yourself. Under the sovereign you could be released from your bond, but not from the King, and the King was under oath to the Pope.

"If anyone shall wish to leave his lord (seniorem,) and is able to prove against him one of these crimes, that is, in the first place, if the lord has wished to reduce him unjustly into servitude; in the second place, if he has taken counsel against his life ; in the third place if the lord has committed adultery with the wife of his vassal, in the fourth place if he has wilfully attacked him with a drawn sword ; in the fifth place, if the lord has been able to bring defence to his vassal after he has commended his hands to him, and has not done so ; it is allowed to the vassal to leave him. If the lord has perpetrated anything against the vassal in these five points it is allowed the vassal to leave him.” (CAPITULARY CONCERNING FREEMEN AND VASSALS, 816AD - M.G.LL,I,196.Latin.)

At the start feudalism in Normandy under the Carolingian dynasty property was of two kinds; the holders of allodial lands enjoyed them absolutely and independently. On the other hand within the fraud of ownership granted through the church, benefices ("a church living") or fiefs (from the Anglo-Saxon feof, cattle, money) were granted by a lord to a person who, in return for that grant, and for the protection it insured on the part of the baron, obliged himself inferior, and to do military service, to render pecuniary assistance, and to be in subjugation. Now it would frequently happen that the owner of allodial property, isolated amongst all his independence, found it impossible to live securely and comfortably in the vicinity of barons stronger or more powerful than themselves, as no equitable system of tort relief was in place. He would then select one of these barons or feudal lords, recommend himself to him, as the saying was, make over to him by a kind of feigned cession (to yield, the act of ceding) his allodial property, and then receive it back again as a benefice, together with all the duties, obligations, and burdens belonging to it. As a matter of course, beneficiary property soon formed the rule, except south of the Loire, and there was no landed property which did not depend upon another property, no man who was not the vassal or dependent of another man. The hereditary transmission of landed property and of all charges, offices, and positions of trust was sanctioned by the edict of Kiersy (877).

This shows the difference between a society without the protection of arbitration and bonds, a system of ex-tort-ion, and one like Albien that had a bonded society with equitable arbitration, without these bonds no man can be free, as torts are never given relief and fear of your neighbour, who can act without restraint or accountability, drives souls to seek the comparative safety of slavery. This is the difference between an un-bonded society without recourse, which leads inexorably into feudalism, and a bonded society free of hierarchy and relief in all disputes.

The feudal system imposed through the domination of the land by war ‘lords’, established the ‘simple trust’ which holds all in ownership, invented and imposed through genocide, and in Britain catalogued by the Doomsday books in 1086; those upon the land held by the Landlord are subject to the policy of the landlord known as law.


We now suffer a culture of entitlement based upon rights; rights are an extension of a grant (unattested), a grant is to believe without witness a superior will give a benefit or privilege, as benefits under a government (government means-mind control – govern mental); to give (a person or thing) a title, right, or claim to something; furnish a person or thing with grounds for laying claim. A ‘Right’ means a just claim (superiors grant), ‘to cry out justly’ to an authority if that granted right is denied or infringed; but only slaves have masters and can be granted privilege known as rights.

We must move away from ideas of entitlements such as rights and claims based in external authority, to ideas of equitable relief through redressing a wrong to heal, and witnessed actions, self-declared and local community based.

We must understand and apply our ‘Inherent power’ which is an authority possessed without it being derived from another; being our true reciprocal obligation and responsibility to others, or ability, or faculty of doing a thing, without receiving that as a perceived right, or ability, or faculty granted from another.

The sheep of society will battle fiercely for their ‘rights’, granted by the abasing upon their victim.

However in all other languages, what we call the law is denoted by a term signifying RIGHT: Latin by JUS: in the German by RECHT: in the French by DROIT: in Italian by DIRITTO etc.

All those terms denoting ‘rights’ apply to grants from a superior authority, so fundamentally equal to the policy of a landlord but as grants instead of dictates, therefore all represent a positive law model, clearly law and rights could never bind a free living soul as all living souls are equal as an innate natural state, to have a superior authority can only be imposed through force or the threat of force upon those viewed as slaves.


The original purpose of all courts was to act as a medium of arbitration to give equitable relief from dispute or tortious actions between living souls (inventivum anima), it would be impossible to impose corporate policy upon a living soul, it can only be impose upon an incorporated legal fiction, an incorporeal entity; they could never impose a superior authority on a living soul, in any reasoned way, as it is an affront to the innate inherent power of every living inventive, premeditating soul (inventivum anima).

This invented and imposed corporate policy now dominates the courts, based upon a superior authority of unnatural function, ratified by the fiction of collective ‘right’.

That imposition can be only upon those held in citizen-ship, the vessel of their enslavement, both economic and mental, they are the slave upon their vessel, and the owner of that ship grants them rights of conduct; that is a power, privilege, faculty, or demand, inherent in one person and incident upon another, the correlative of 'duty' or 'obligation', granted from a superior authority to an inferior man or woman.

Positive law is authoritatively imposed; meaning without being imposed through force or implied force, these laws would in the main be ignored as they are unnatural, and function in general to maintain monopoly, usury, privilege and criminal advantage; so only by positive enforcement it is policy of law; all ‘law’ being the imposed authority of the ‘Lord’ owning the land and all upon it, and all rights being a granted concession or appropriation of that authority.

This is why citizen-‘ships’ are held in the dock of a court, and the landlord’s agents, sworn under oath as such, of judge, magistrate, lawyer, barrister, solicitor and attorney arbitrates which ship in dispute must pay the landlord.

In contrast ‘Terrente relief’ allows anyone who is harmed to relief, or who is cheated or robbed to recover their loss. Terrente relief is not positive law, as it’s victim determined, and initiated, as it is based on protection of the individual and not imposition; there are many positive law systems in place that are designed and intended to only be applied to a ‘slave’, turning a man into an object of trade, through the straw man of corporation, which is a fictional state imposed by force or implied force, and not a natural state of a free man or woman.


To escape the straw man of ‘citizen-ship’ being a corporation imposed upon you through the ‘berth’ –‘place on a ship (of State)’ (Birth) ‘made certain’ (certificate), it would be reasonable to resign from your citizenship corporation, through a declaration of legal action that would terminate your relationship to the business entity of citizen as its officer. The state allows the removal of nationality and the transfer of citizenship to another corporate State, which is not of use; it is not the removal of the indigenous location, but the separation of the straw man of citizenship from the living inventive, premeditating soul (inventivum anima).

All trust based courts function in fictions, so these courts of fictional foundation act only against corporations for corporations; this is where the fictions will attempt to enforce all claims, duties, obligations and entitlements against you. Send your resignation to the board of directors in writing, including the date on which the resignation will take effect. The State invented your corporation so they must be the grantors and the board of directors; inform the highest officers of that incorporeal entity of State, your corporation of citizenship has no corporeal body acting as its officer, agent or representative.

The initial problem with this is the corporations are the gate keepers at present to the prisons of State, which are designed to allow a citizenship to pass from one State to another as a neutral merchant vessel during the progress of war, for this you need a passport licence issued from the port of origin, unfortunately corporations only recognise legal fictions, and so a living inventive, premeditating soul (inventivum anima) cannot pass through their port without holding a berth certified on a citizen-ship as a fiction attached.

The answer to this problem is difficult, and would be to swear out a Terrente complaint against the agent acting for the corporation of State to seek relief of them directly. The costs incurred, the time wasted, the inconvenience suffered for their preventing you from passing, and the relief you demand to satisfy these torts imposed upon you. If the agents of corporation are forced to pay for the actions they impose on behalf of the State themselves, it will be harder for the State to continue to attract agents, and for those agents to act with impunity, arrogance and contempt.

There are several forms of positive law, all being a body of rules of conduct of binding ‘legal’ force and effect, prescribed, recognized, and enforced by a controlling authority imposed by force or implied force upon the individual:

Criminal law - which deals with situations where a person's actions cause harm to the legal fiction of society in general (they would have to prove who the abstract fiction of society was, as I can only wrong another living man, woman or child, I can only wrong individuals, a fiction of the public, community or society cannot be wronged, as it is just an abstract construct, an incorporeal fictional entity).

The term ‘public’, ‘State’, ‘Society’ and ‘sovereign people’ denotes ‘the whole body politic’, which is the definition of a State corporate legal entity, which claims authority over the aggregate of all its citizens. A citizen is a possessor of all rights and privileges and subject to its corresponding duties. ‘Politic’ means a member of a ‘civitas’ – citizenship. A body politic means the collective body of all citizenships.

A citizen is derived from city, as it was an incorporated member of the city of Rome, being distinguished from a slave who was the property of a citizen, this idea has been extended, so the citizen is a corporate body and the slave is the property of that incorporeal entity, so all living inventive, premeditating soul (inventivum anima) are made in the ‘world’ the slave of the citizenship they represent, and a slave takes the name of his master.

Authority - means to originate creation, the author, and ‘–ity’, meaning ‘the state or reality’, the circumstances attributes; so the legal fiction of State creates, so ‘authors’, the legal fiction of citizenship that holds the man as its agent, and the creator of a thing has control over its use, controlling its circumstances and attributes, they have authority of what they author.

"Since there is no such entity as 'the public,' since the public is merely a number of individuals, the idea that 'the public interest' supersedes private interests and rights can have but one meaning: that the interests and rights of some individuals take precedence over the interests and rights of others." -- Ayn Rand

Statutory Equity law - in which a petitioner complains of a violation of some granted right; legal equity deals with legal fiction of trusts and the legal fiction of property (trusts are generic corporations; rights are grants from a superior therefore to impose equity they would need to prove I was a consenting agent of a trust, further they would have to prove the living soul granting rights were superior to me, to grant rights upon me, for those rights to be a privilege; and as rights granted I do not have without them, that I have consented to accepting in witnessed and signed agreement directly, with full knowledge of all duties attached).

Commercial law - deals with ‘legal contracts’ which are legal agreement between fictional parties of corporation, and differ from witnessed written agreements between living individuals (no living man can be a party to a contract, which are exclusively between corporations, therefore they would have to prove I was acting as an agent of a corporation to impose contract obligations or corporate policy upon me, this they could do through the fictional corporation of citizenship, but that is an office I have never signed or sworn to act within).

Civil law - A body of rules that delineate private rights and remedies, and govern disputes between individuals in such areas as contracts, property, and family law; distinct from criminal or public law. Civil law systems, which trace their roots to ancient Rome, are governed by doctrines developed and compiled by legal scholars. Legislators and administrators in civil law countries use these doctrines to fashion a code by which all legal controversies are decided. (All rights are granted, whether explicit rights, State sanctioned, or implicit rights State granted or conceded, the State has to prove they have authority upon me to grant me a right, as I am only bound by my inherent power, expressed through the manner of conduct dictated by the innate nature of “Animas-kind” the family of the living soul, and exercised by the reciprocal obligations and responsibilities innate to each living inventive, premeditating soul (inventivum anima), and in their founding nature, proven upon reason and equitable conduct, I am not bound by law or restricted by granted rights, but by the rules of conduct demanded by reciprocation of my innate inherent power.)

Private - means ‘to rob’ from Latin ‘prīvāre’ – ‘deprives’; a ‘private citizen’ cannot be an official; so to be robbed (private), one cannot be an incumbent of an office.

Private law - is concerned with the definitions, regulations, and enforcement of granted rights in cases were both citizens in whom the rights inheres and citizen who the obligation is incident are private (to rob) individuals. (A positive law system based on granted rights, privilege, entitlement, and duties, cannot bind any living inventive, premeditating soul (inventivum anima), as no living inventive, premeditating soul (inventivum anima) is superior to any other living inventive, premeditating soul (inventivum anima) to be able to grant the other rights, they would have to prove a superior over me before they could impose their law.)

Public law - is concerned with the State within its political or sovereign capacity, including constitutional and administrative law, and with the definition, regulation and enforcement of granted rights in cases where the State is regarded as being the granter, (so those subjugated under the States domination, control, or influence by ‘rights’ granted, or from a granted right being the object of the ‘duty’ of those subjugated through force by that imposed authority; the State has to prove I am bound by that authority, that the right they grant is not merely my inherent power of a reciprocal obligation and responsibility to those around me, that all are born with, and that my full witnessed and signed acceptance in written agreement of all considerations and duties are consented to by me directly, before their law could be imposed.)

Common law - is the opposite of statutory, equitable, or civil, it is derived from case law, based upon precedent of the legal dictates of a judge (each judge would need to prove their superiority to dictate binding opinions upon other living souls, upon each instance, and by what reason other souls would be bound to their ‘opinions’).

Maritime law also called "admiralty law" or "the law of admiralty" - the legislations and regulations, including international agreements and treaties, which exclusively govern activities at sea or in any navigable waters (they would need to prove that the souls who drafted and signed the charter were superior to those who were bound by its dictates, as all souls are equal and can only vary in skills and knowledge, they would further need to prove that others were bound to an agreement they had not signed before that charter, treaty, implied contract or agreement could be impose upon another).

MARITIME: From 13th Century Latin maritimeo/maritimus = "The mariner fleet of the Sea (Holy See) to be feared". From earlier Latin maris "sea" and timeo "to fear, be afraid, dread". From 16th Century English/French "Of the Sea".

Divine law - authoritative religious writings such as Scripture imposed as legislation enacted by a hierarchical system of religious figures (within the axioms of the land they would need to first prove the existence of their God, then further prove that God had legislated upon the inherent power each is born with, and if that legislation of religious law contradicted that innate nature it would stand as a contradiction to the truth of their claim, as if the Creator had established an innate nature expressed through the innate natural axioms all “Animas-kind” the family of the living soul is bound to through an equitable reciprocal obligation and responsibility to those around them, then it is not reasoned to have legislation imposed upon me).

What is Due Process?

Law is divided into substantive and adjective. Substantive law is that part of the law which creates rights and obligations, while adjective law provides a method of enforcing and protecting them. In other words adjective law is the law of procedure.

Adjective administration through courts of justice, as a tribunal of its constitution (legislation- corporate policy), given validity by the law of its own creation, (meaning each created granted right is only valid within the confines of its use, if you do not consent to granted rights from a superior as valid, then they cannot be applied), as a determiner of rights granted by the settled (agreed upon- through consent) power of the corporate government:

1. The right of the ‘person’ (citizen) affected thereby be present before the tribunal which pronounces judgement upon the question of life, liberty, or property.

2. To be heard by testimony or otherwise.

3. To have the right of controverting, by proof every material fact which bears on the question of ‘right’ in the matter involved.

4. If any question of fact or liability be conclusively ‘presumed’ against him this is not the due process of law.

Due process is a guarantee that a law shall not be unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious. Originating in common law these are the rules that individuals shall not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without notice and an opportunity to defend themselves, and it predates written constitutions.

It is divided into the two categories being Substantive Due Process which defines reciprocal obligations and responsibilities, and procedural due process which enforces those definitions. This is corrupted in the corporate system making substantive due process the definition of rights granted and not the inherent power of the individual.

A summons is an authoritative demand for a corporation or its agent to appear in a specific place at a specific time linked with severance, which is to divide into separate parts the liabilities of a contract, estate etc. establishing what each party is liable for, further to separate the fiction from the physical, as corporate courts only deal with the fiction hence the need to make a living man an agent of a corporation through citizenship. A ship means "to create, ordain, appoint."

Substantive Due Process

In the Crown corporations courts of Britain all substantive cases must be settled through the sterling principle for the award of damages; this therefore cannot be based on, or in the nature of any trust and confidence in a fiduciary debt note issued by a private corporation, held as fiat through a granted privilege monopoly by an inequitably imposed superior, as this is not a form of substantive relief with true intrinsic value as representative or directly convertible into sterling silver.

It must be in Sterling, if this is the principle agreed, having the standard fineness of 0.925 for sterling silver coinage or in a form that represents that intrinsic form substantively, meaning it must be real, natural and actual substance having independent function, resources, and standing by itself, of natural substance and tangible being and existence free of fictions of imposed authority.

What are torts?

Tortious means - of the nature of or pertaining to a tort. A tort is the act in direct opposition to right conduct or equitable action, the older and better term is terrente, meaning the peace of the mind threatened, torts means only wrongful actions.

In natural equitable Terrente axioms of the land, a complainer declares a tort, meaning a wrongful act (from Latin tortus – writhing - mental discomfort); meaning to inflict an action causing mental distress or discomfort to another or others being someone who suffers a tort-ious injury. Torts cannot then include a breach of legal contract or trust, as both are legal fictional constructs, a contract is a legal agreement between fictional parties of corporation which cannot therefore suffer mentally, and so cannot be considered a natural agreement as the incorporeal entities do not exist in nature. A legal trust is a generic form of corporation, again a legal fiction against nature that can suffer no mental discomfort.

In equity if you are accused of a tort, you are responding to that declaration as the ‘retorter’ (from Latin - twisting or writhing back). Retorter means: a man who answers (an argument or the like) made by another to the contrary; as when in tortious arbitration it is only for those who are in dispute.

Con-tort - is twisted together thwarted to oppose successfully; prevent from accomplishing a purpose, meaning to prevent another establishing relief for their declared tort, through twisting together facts and reason to oppose successfully.

Tort-uous - full of twists, turns, or bends; twisting, winding, or crooked – a devious or cunning, and intricate long drawn out argument to thwart, as a successful method to rebut or disprove a declared tort.

Dis-tort - to twist awry or out of shape; make crooked or deformed: to give a false, perverted, or disproportionate meaning to either a complaining tort, or a retort.

De-tort – to twist about, to turn from the original that which is halfway between extremes, meaning to remove a tort where equity in dispute will provide no specific relief, where the parties are found equal, or where neither has been wronged. To detort removes the tort from dispute.

Ex-tort – to twist wrench, means as a relief to place outside of the protection of torts, to be outcast from the community exiled, banished, driven out. This term can also be used for an individual, an ‘extortionist’ who acts as an extorter; to obtain money or other valuable things either by compulsion, by actual force of motives applied to the ‘will’, and often more overpowering and irresistible than physical force, taking what is not due, an ‘extortionate’ amount, or before the time when it is due, attempting to force their victim to believe they are outside of the protection of torts or unable to demand there protection.

Tort-uous - to twist, bend, deceitfully indirect or morally crooked, as proceedings, methods, or policy; devious.

Tort-ure twisting torment, the act of inflicting excruciating pain, as punishment or revenge, as a means of getting a confession or information, or for sheer cruelty.

A tort-feasor (feasor- doer, maker) – one who committed or is guilty of a tort

What are benefits and duties?

Human Slavery- The state of subjugation and control held upon you, of a master owning the fruits of your severe toils, and drudgery in exchange for the ‘benefits’ you receive from your disadvantage. Slavery is a relation founded in force, not in equity, existing, where it does, by force of legal codes (positive law) imposed as duties.

A ‘benefit’ is the advantage, profit, or privilege granted by corporate government to a citizen, all corporations are legal citizens of the State.

A ‘duty’ is a corporate government imposition, including all manner of taxes and charges invented. A duty is the reciprocal relationship to a right which lies outside the jural sphere (outside of the courts).   

Entitlement is the act to entitle, giving a ‘right’ through ‘title’, being the written evidence of a granted ‘right’.

What is the implied contract?

The implied contract, is implied-in-law, and is the presumption of implied power to impose (an implied contract is in contrast to an express contract). Where the intention in regard to the subject matter is not manifested by explicit or direct words, but is gathered by implication, as claimed naturally to be inferred or understood.

The implied contract which is unwritten is presumed to apply, however if any question of fact or liability be conclusively ‘presumed’ against an individual this is not the due process of law, and any contract that is implied should be produced to be examined and rebutted.

Implied powers – powers are granted rights from a superior, and are such as are necessary to make available and carry into effect those powers which are expressly granted from a superior upon an inferior man or woman (an inferior man or woman is a slave), or conferred as a burden upon an inferior man or woman, and which must therefore be presumed to have been within the intention of the subjugating constitutional or legislative grant.

“In regard to the so-called social contract, I have often had occasion to protest that I haven’t seen the contract, much less been asked to consent to it. A valid contract requires voluntary offer, consideration and acceptance. I’ve never received an offer from my rulers, so I certainly have not accepted one; and rather than consideration, I have received nothing but contempt from the rulers, who, notwithstanding the absence of any agreement, have indubitably threatened me with grave harm in the event that I fail to comply to their edicts.” Robert Higgs

Part of that social contract  is Social Security but this is neither insurance nor a contract; it is a discretionary benefit revocable at will by the owners (a slave may own nothing) of the Federal regime. Payment of FICA taxes do not create an obligation of the Federal regime to pay anyone anything, ever. This same social security structure is the common structure globally.


Login Form

Lost Password?

Hijriah Date

Jamadil Akhir


Supreme Existence
God And Allah. Updated
The Meaning Of Life
Freedom Means Responsibility
This Earth Is Precious
Qur'anic Caliphate
The Truth
Human Energy
Spiritual Evolution.
The Five Pillows Of Islam.
Salat (Desire)
The Blinding Light Of Islam Extinguished.
Islam Demands Reason.
Islamic Finance.
The Unnecessary Energy Crisis: How to Solve It Quickly.
Time Explained.
The Misanthrope.
The HIV-AIDS Question.
A Debate On Money.
Chaos Transduced.
The Advent Of The Muslims.
Islam A Challenge To Religion.
Sweet Poison.
The Three Given Keys Of Existence.
Divine Spark.
The Heavens The Earth And The Qur’an.
Mohammad's Awakening.
The Engines of Creation.
A Dying Ember
Melded Multiple Infinities.
A Sadness Within Me.
The Dichotomy of humanity; the singular unity of being both Mortal and Immortal.
The purpose of humanities creation.
Interface With Islam
The potentials of Death.
Why the banks are failing.
The Subjugated Mind.
Allodial Earth.
CHAPTER 6 from the book "DESCENT into SLAVERY”
The Vatican.
Theft: Punishment or Relief
The Fractional Reserve Banking System.
The Symbols of Religion.
The Big Bang, a BIG lie.
The formation of a galaxy, evolving a universe.
Our Conscious Mind As An Electromagnetic Field
Hadith (part one).
Hadith Continued (part two).
Confessions Of English Spy Who Helped create Wahhabism.
The Detached.
Law of Men. (The First Crusade)
Rex Offa of Albien (Britain)
Constitution of Allah. Transfinite Consciousness.
The Human Soul Nexus.
The History of Arabic Grammar.
Why do the Innocent suffer, the answer.
A Careful Linguistic Analysis of the term Allah.
I skipped, and I danced, and I sang.
I am.
Who destroyed Alexandria Library?
The Empty Vessel.
Islam: What is the Quran and Sunnah? (Written in Arabic)
The Lie of Hijab. (Written in Arabic)
Human Energy Economic System.
Aspartame is Rumsfeld's Disease: A Politically-Induced Biochemical Disaster Of Global Proportions.
Polycentric Community.
Establishing Freedom of Evil at all Times within Bonded Community
Sovereignty is with Allah alone
University community model.
190 Lughaat-ul-Qur'an
Islamic Supermarket
Car Insurance.
Islamic repository
The Skill of Discourse
The Natural Rights Clothes Shop
Meanings of Terms of law
A simple Lexicon investigation of a single verse of the Qur'an
The Nature of Ownership.
Police State: What is a police Officer?
Free Energy Plasma Engine
Part One. The Writ
Part Three: Gemot Administrators of Terrente (the peace of their mind threatened) Relief
Part Four - Wite and Surety Bound-Souls
Eight point community plan
Equitable Allodial Utilisation (overview)
Proposed Method of Allodium Witnessed Declaration
Affidavit of Allodium Witnessed Declaration
‘Bona Gestura’ Bond of Allodarii
Notice of pursuance of Allodium Witnessed Declaration
Declaration of Allodial Utilisation
Polycentric community (overview)
The Substantive Binding Surety (overview)
Reciprocated Agreement of Binding Surety
Anarchic Labour Trading
The Repository (overview)
Bonded Cooperative Occupational System
Plenary Allodium Utilisation Averment
Cooperative Assurance System
Cooperative Car Assurance
Medical Assurance
Winters slave
The Nature of War
The Nature of Democracy
The Nature of Sovereignty
The Third State of Consciousness
Inherent Power (short overview)
Part Two: How a Substantive Gemot of Axiological Inherent Power Functions through Axioms of the Land
Part Five - Terrente - Duty of Care - Outcast
The Law, Courts and Jurisdiction
Repository Securities and Advance
The Nature of Copyright
The Nature of Government
The Nature of Capitalism
Islamic Banking
The Court System versus the Witena-Gemot System
A Duty of Care
The Trivium
The Concept and Structure of Polycentric community
The Nature of Economics
The Protected Paedophiles, Child Rapists, Child Torturers, and Child Murders of the British Establis
Arbitration of Universal Accountability - Terrente Relief
Unilateral Bond of Repository Administrator
The Nature of the Hospital System
Hemp Drugs Commission Report, completed in 1894
Unlawful Killing
A Bonded Militia
Duty of Care Trading Declaration (food)
Bonded Cooperative Networks
Freedom or Slavery
Matrimonial Agreement
Part Six - Relief, Recourse and the Jury
Part Seven - Constructive versus Substantive
The Education Assurance Bond
Predator and Prey
Francis of Assisi
Possession versus Utilisation of the Land
NOTICE: No Implied or inferred right of access
Crowd Funding
The Master of the Soul
The Nature of Money
What is voting?
What is a Citizen?
As Above so Below
Fencing (Austerity)
Jews and the Global Sex Slavery Business
Rise of Sea Levels is 'The Greatest Lie Ever Told'
The Nature of Death
The Singing Soul