Servant Of The Light.

Part One - Establishing a natural law court

he  rit

1.     The modern Writ system has passed down from antiquity and still mimics in some respects the old model, described below is the only structure that would support the natural law integrating all the fragments of the system that have survived the purge of Church and Crown corporations.

2.     The origins of the writ are based within natural prescriptive law; this was used within Albion for centuries before the invasion of the Roman Catholic Church Corporation.

3.     The history of Britain is founded upon the stories of the Roman Catholic Church corporation, much like the stories of the American Government corporation with the events of 9/11, or the British Crown corporation on the events of the Titanic or 7/7; they spin a web of lies that fail to hold up to any reasoned investigation, yet through the domination of institutions they maintain these inventions. The archaeological sites around Britain demonstrate that in the 6^th century the population of Britain who had for centuries lived in skilfully built stone houses, with under floor heating, tiled roofs and cobbled roads, had almost overnight return to a primitive state of subsistence living, and the corporations suggest a history of the Romans holding Britain as a colony and abandoning it, the indigenous population were SO stupid they instantaneously began to live in simple stick and mud dwellings, scratching an existence from the land, losing any knowledge of masonry, plumbing, roofing, metallurgy, or glasswork.

4.     There is evidence to support a different version of events; in 562 a meteor strikes the North Sea transforming society.

5.     This catalyst exposed the frauds of sovereignty, and religion, forcing those who survived the natural disaster to take stock and establish a system founded on law and community, not sovereignty and religion.

6.     It is this natural prescriptive law system that will be explained with this essay and those that follow.

7.     The courts, called moots, were public assemblies of common men and neighbours. The administrators of the moots did not expend their efforts on creating or codifying the law. As it was based on remedy not punishment, this meant the victim was the judge of what they felt to be an encroachment; they through the court sort remedy, and the jury of their peers arbitrated their claim.

8.     The law was based on simple principles evident to all, and are held in maxims of law to this day.

9.     The first principle is you must do all you have agreed to do; this is the foundation of all contract law.

10.  The second principle is you cannot encroach upon another man or woman; this is the foundation of all civil and criminal law.

11. The outcome of a dispute turned entirely on the facts of the case, a fact being that which both parties in dispute agree is true, which were usually established through oath-giving within written affidavit.

12. The disputants first swore to their accusations and denials. Each party then called on oath helpers (witnesses to any relevant events, and members of their surety groups in support of their good character) to back up these claims with written oaths of their own.

13.  The system of law enforcement hinged upon the writ system and the surety bond. 

14.   A Writ is a ‘Letter of Action’, a written letter of one who is appointed as an administrator of the court, as an order issued pursuant to law before the facts (precept) under seal (meaning signed and witnessed) of summons to stand before a jury of your peers to arbitrate the dispute.

15.The accuser, known as the plaintiff (complainer) in modern courts, who believed they had suffered an encroachment, sued (to make petition or appeal to) the court for a writ of action again the defendant.

16. The writ has the details of both parties if known, the outline of the complaint and the remedy sort by the complainer, with a date and time to appear for arbitration by a jury of your peers.

17. The accuser takes the writ and hands it to the party accused, this must be witnessed or a signed acceptance given by the defendant of the encroachment, an encroachment is known as a tort, which meant ‘a wrongful act’; the defendant has three choices:

a.     The defendant can accept the writ and apply the remedy demanded.

b.     They can accept the writ and defend themselves in court to establish the truth.

c.      They can refuse to accept the writ. If the writ is refused the accuser must find themselves a rex, a title which means ‘to put right’, the modern equivalent of a rex is the Sherriff of the court, who is still the highest authority in the land; anyone the accuser considers capable of successful enforcing the writ could be the rex.

18. The rex takes the writ to the court who issued it, the administrator of the court writes a warrant ‘to guarantee as true’ the writ.

19.  If the encroachment was committed by an unknown party, a writ is made and the plaintiff (complainer) selects a rex to establish through investigation, if possible, the identity of the defendant, the rex applies the same method of seeking a warrant to guarantee the writs truth.

20.   A Warrant is the extension of a writ, a Warrant is a written letter of one who is appointed as an administrator of the court, directing the doing of an act, addressed to a man or woman capable of doing the act, and affording them protection from damage of detriment or injury sustained by the defendant for doing so, within the constraints of the duty of care each man or woman for their neighbour. And may require them to arrest the body of a person therein named, and bring them before the court.

21. A warrant is issued on the refusal of a writ, the refusal of a remedy or the unlawful detention of a man or woman, a warrant is a physical demand of the court. Every man, woman and child has an inalienable right to liberty, if this is denied you can demand a prerogative writ initiated by any man or woman on your behalf if you am restrained from obtaining one yourself, this functions by empowering with the law the individual in holding, making accountable the exercise of the societies and communities around them, from the unlawful imprisonment, through improper executive, judicial, or private restraints of "civil" confinements within incarceration facilities labelled, prisons, jails, camps, hospitals, re-education facilities, mental institutions, or whatever form it may take, all used to restrain others unlawfully. Protection of liberty demanded through the writ of ‘Habeas Corpus’ (held body) from the court, which is an ancient law of the land prerogative writ - a lawful procedure to which you have an undeniable right. It is an extraordinary remedy at law. Upon proper application, or even on naked knowledge alone, every lawful court is empowered, and is duty bound, to issue the Extraordinary Writ of Habeas Corpus commanding one who is restraining liberty, so holding imprisoned another, to forthwith produce before the court the man, woman or child who is in custody and to show cause why the liberty of that man/woman is being restrained, and if the court finds no just cause, remedy must be established for the victim of that unlawful restraint. The term imprisonment usually imports a restraint contrary to the wishes of the prisoner; and the writ of habeas corpus is designed as a remedy for them, to be invoked at their insistence, to set them at liberty, not to change their keeper. In the case of an infant or a child of tender years that is detained improperly from the tangible man or woman entitled to their custody and guardianship, that being sufficient ground to invoke and maintain the writ of habeas corpus.

22.  A Rex was not a king, but an aspect of the law system. Men aided a Rex voluntarily. A Rex who could be a man or woman had to offer battle gear, and food, to get others to follow them into battle, more importantly, they volunteered to champion the cause of the weak -- for a ‘fee’ meaning they had a share in the wite, as no free tangible man or woman can lawfully be bound with any sovereign, and under natural prescriptive law no sovereign or state can lawfully exist to compel.

23. Another function of those who were willing to champion the cause of the weak, acting as a rex, was the enforcing of verdicts of the jury, for example to take back stolen property and return it to the rightful possessor as the jury of a court established. 

24. The defendant, who had failed to honour the writ, would have to pay all the costs of the rex, this surcharge was called wite, and made enforcing the law a profitable business for the Rex.

25. If the defendant could not pay the remedy or the wite, the burden of payment would fall to the surety bondsmen the defendant held in contract.

26. The defendant would be obligated to repay his bondsmen as soon as possible. Within the system of natural law only the fruits of the labours of the defendant could be seized, all property was allodially held, therefore no claim could be made upon a man or woman’s land, home, furnishings, tools, or their ability to sustain themselves and those who they supported, only the disposable produce that was available for sale or exchange, or their stored labours in the form of silver or gold or whatever store was used, could be considered in remedy.

27. This was a victim empowered system, and is based upon the principles of natural law.

28. With the arrival of the Roman Catholic Church Corporation over 20 year Albion suffered a genocide instigated by Pope Alexander II and executed through the agents of the Church Corporation, lead by Guillaume le Bâtard, commonly known as William the Conqueror, which placed the simple trust of ownership upon the land, its people and its resources, through the force of arms, this reversed the lawful system and imposed a legal system, which functions to a great extent in opposition to the lawful model.

29. The Moot court system was adapted by those who subjugated the population and much of its structure has remained, passed down to the present day, the court issue writs, warrants, prerogatives, and subpoenas, which are all forms of writ, but now it is through the invented authority of the corporation not the victim, the remedy is removed and revenue for the corporation is generated under the guise of punishment.

Part Two - How an Equitable Court of Prescriptive Natural Law of the Land Functions