Articles
Conceptual understandings of Islam.
The Onion of Ownership. | The Onion of Ownership. |
|
|
|
| Written by Abdun Nur | |
|
What is ownership? Ownership is the key building block in the establishment and advancement of the modern capitalist socio-economic system, now utilised to enslave humanity, pollute the earth and drain all resources, under the control of a comparatively small number of people, but what is ownership? Ownership is title, which is separated and held by different parties, which means, when you buy immovable property it is always under the concept of 'Sharing gains' that are expected to be generated from that property. Real property is immovable property, but even other types of property can be held under similar shared gain ownership (control) systems. 'Ownership' (meaning to have control over) this is the original Norman feudal preference for land use. In the feudal system the crown was the owner (legal possessor) of all land, and everyone who occupied land paid the crown rent directly or indirectly. Property tax, paid to the state, can be seen as a continuation of that system. So everything under ownership is held by the (corporate) crown (UK or corporate state in other countries) and they require a share of the gain from that title, which is there (legal) entitlement. Additionally as they hold second (after the Church) title they can take possession of the land whenever they require from the tenant who purchased the immovable property. The Roman Catholic Church hold title to the entire planet under this fraud and all corporate states are chartered by the Church. A Charter - a superior granting an inferior man/woman a right or privilage (privilage - a right to steal) The manmade concept of ownership was applied through trust law, once the claim of ownership is recognised or imposed; you are drawn into the imposition of positive law. Through the creation of positive law you become bound by a ‘simple trust’ in which property is simply held completely, permanently, and inalienably in the ownership of one man or woman for the controlled ‘use’ of another, and the nature of the trust is constrained by the way the law is structured. Unfortunately for those who suffer this encroachment the one, who controls a thing, makes the laws that govern it.
Once a criminal holds the land by force of arms those upon the land are slaves, and so the owner (controller) of the land imposes positive law founded on five impositions. A property would be:
1.subject to the right of the imposition of servitude from those on the property in shared gains (taxation) 2) subject to the right of the imposition to repossess the property from tenants (expropriation) 3) subject to the right of the imposition to inherit the property and tenancy of those without heirs (escheat) 4) subject to the right of the imposition of regulation of all upon the owned property. (positive law known as Legislation ) 5) subject to the right of the imposition of termination of tenancy without recourse. (eminent domain)
The modern ‘Trusts’ are based on the Roman Catholic Templars model, were the “Father” is the grantor of the trust, he invests the substance, being the real physical value, so he is the executor, the “Son” is the administrator of the trust he is the trustee, who can gain no benefit himself, the “Holy Ghost” is the incorporeal entity that holds the substance in a legal instrument. The Church makes the first claim from which all subsequent claims flow, as within the law we can only own what we ourselves create, this means the creator of the Earth and the resources of the Earth belong in their entirety to the Creator. The religious parasites realised that if you could make the Creator a man, from that fraud you could claim ownership of the entire Earth and her resources, the Pope is the substitute for Christ (God) on Earth, and the spiritual adviser to Christ (God) within their fraud. What you truly 'own' is all you have earned, the skills of the mind and hand, the memories of experience and study, the words you speak and the thoughts you harbour; you ‘own’ the efforts you have invested and the fruits of those efforts, beyond that you only have a right of use.
The true ownership you hold binds you to full accountability, making you fully liable, as no other can own what you own, that would be fraud or slavery.
What is Real Estate? Real (the word 'real' relates to a thing (Latin. res, "matter, thing")) - Estate is all interests in land held by a deceased person at death, or a body of men/women united or combined into one body, to make a legal corps (dead body), known as corporation whose holdings are known as mortmain, 'the dead mans hand'. The corporate state owns all property 'legally' as inalienable, but that is directly against the law of the land. All estate is ownership (control) of property by a corps (dead body). Estate from Old French estat, from Latin meaning status - condition - state Many corporations exist from church, state, police, banks to colleges, universities and schools, etc. all function as a legal corps (dead body). So to own immovable property through estate as tenant you have to represent your own corporation, or corps, this requires a straw man, and so the certificate of natural birth becomes the owner, and you represent the fiction becoming the head of the corporation titled 'Mr' (if your a man). From this fiction, new legal frauds can be imposed - Tenement (holding as a possession) - Property, such as land, rents, or franchises, held by one person leasing it from/to another. Under the law a dead man/woman cannot possess immovable property, in truth they can possess nothing, their dead, it immediately falls to their inheritor/s. Ignorance of the law allows title of estate, it's a document that lays claim over the land in colour of title. It is proper, only when no real title or claim of a living man/woman to the land exists. Banks and corporations like Real Estate because they can own it when under the law they cannot. They and others can use the fiction of title to seize land under the colour of law." The colour of law denotes the "mere semblance of legal right", the "pretence or appearance of" right; hence, an action done under colour of law colours (adjusts) the law to the circumstance, yet said apparently legal action contravenes the law. What is a Land Patent? A land patent is the positive law rights to a tract of land, which was acquired by treaty (a contract between two legal fictions of corporate states to manage immovable property) held by the corporate state, through which the government grants an individual or corporation entitlement of control. A land patent serves as a legal (not lawful) proof of land ownership (control). Land patents have more power than any other 'legal' (not lawful) document in establishing proof of land ownership (control). A land patent is considered to be a 'legally' indisputable document. Additionally, legislation mandates that land gained through a land patent is not liable for taxation, so corporation like the Roman Catholic Church corporation, or the Banking Corporations, holding land patent pay no rent upon it to the state. The land stays in their ownership forever. If a legal straw man (individual) acquires a land patent, their legal heirs are granted ownership of the land after their death. Corporate State government, local courts and the Supreme (High) Court have no 'legal' power to remove land from a person's ownership (control), and the land patent trumps all other 'legal' documents. Nobody can 'legally' dispute ownership (control). Which has benefit, Control or Use? Ownership is not lawful just as control of a thing is not lawful, slavery is control (ownership) over the actions of a man/woman, ownership is control over the land, no one has a right to control land, so hoarding it to deprive those who labours upon it from receiving the fruits of their labours; ownership is control over resources, no one has the right to hoard the resources of the earth, to monopolise, exploit and restrict. We each of us only have a right of use, we came into the world with nothing and we leave with nothing, the labours of our lives we leave behind for the future, the right to use the land and her resources is inalienable, that IS THE LAW. Natural Law upon Allodial Rights of Use To claim title to the land cannot be supported within control (ownership), only within a right of use, each person who wishes to use land must make an Allodial right of use claim in written lawful contract, verified by the men/women who live within the local community around the physical location of the land/property claim (as these men/women are the only lawful parties concerned), this is the only lawful method, whether in evolving an existing claim into an allodial right or making any allodial claim without concern for the frauds of estate. Likewise any alteration, improvements, or structures upon the land that encroach upon those around the claimed right of use, such as structures that dominate the views of neighbours, or activities that cause strong foul odours, like pig farming, or excessive noises, beyond what is reasonable, would require the consent of those around them (without prier consent would represent an encroachment upon another). Of course to damage surrounding claims with environmental poisons of groundwater or air, or any other form of encroachment from claimed use that are not speedily rectified, could forfeit all rights of claim to the land, established through arbitration of a Court of committee plea (Moot) of twelve peers to establish remedy (which is the law of the land). To build structures upon a claim of land that represents a saleable value of your labour, at the point of sale must comply to the minimum safety standards of the local community, as to build an unsafe structure endangers the lives of others, and through that logic would be an encroachment upon them (breaking natural law - the law of the land). Under old Roman law based upon control (ownership) of land and property, you had claim to control to the centre of the earth and the limits of the sky, so that would demand you grant consent for others to use the sky above your claim, and prevents others from mining beneath your claim without written contract, as is done by the state today. This is not in line with natural law. Under the logic of natural law each man/woman has a right of way over any allodial claim, both personal and communal, as long as they caused no damage or encroachment upon any other while doing so, a holder of allodial claim can establish set path of rights of way around crops or to allow privacy upon their land, which obliges others to remain upon the set rights of way created. In the sky above any claim all would have a right of way as long as they did not encroach upon those claims they passed over, through noise pollution, air pollution, falling objects or chemicals, etc., all these would represent encroachments. Noise for example would be reasonable acceptable levels; otherwise the noise of birds would prevent their free access, which would be unreasonable. Within the law only contracts verified between men/women are lawful, you cannot be a party to a contract with a legal fiction, and you cannot have a contract imposed upon you without your consent and verification. The further understand the right of use concepts please read: Allodial rights of use |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
| Rejab |
| 2 Wednesday |
| 1433 HIJRAH |